2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0725-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent competition between goal-directed and habitual response preparation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
253
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
33
253
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preservation of this skilled behavior after extinction of the external cues, maintaining the same high level speedaccuracy trade-off, is an additional sign of automaticity and habitual control. Our findings are consistent with Hardwick et al (2019), who also demonstrated that practice influences habits by modulating the likelihood of habit expression via reducing the average time of movement initiation (Hardwick et al, 2019). We also found that in later stages of the training, our participants' response preparation times were extremely brief and unlikely to enable expression of goal-directed responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The preservation of this skilled behavior after extinction of the external cues, maintaining the same high level speedaccuracy trade-off, is an additional sign of automaticity and habitual control. Our findings are consistent with Hardwick et al (2019), who also demonstrated that practice influences habits by modulating the likelihood of habit expression via reducing the average time of movement initiation (Hardwick et al, 2019). We also found that in later stages of the training, our participants' response preparation times were extremely brief and unlikely to enable expression of goal-directed responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Habits have been assumed to require practice or repeated training as demonstrated in experimental animals (e.g., Adams and Dickinson, 1981) and humans (Tricomi et al, 2009). However, it has proven to be surprisingly difficult to demonstrate robust habit learning in humans as a function of training (de Wit et al, 2018), possibly for reasons related to the time allowed for response preparation prior to execution (Hardwick et al, 2019), the need for much longer periods of training for humans than are possible in the laboratory and a focus on single actions rather than more complex sequences of behavior. Dezfouli and Balleine (2012) have argued that "habits are complex actions that reflect the association of a number of actions into rapidly executed action sequences. "…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results showed that practicing with few repeating consecutive trials led to a greater 529 skill improvement. Participants practiced the task for several thousand trials, and were able to 530 improve their ability to produce short-latency responses, consistent with previous work 531 indicating that relatively high volumes of training allow participants to produce automatic, 532 habitual responses (Hardwick et al 2019). As skill acquisition requires extensive practice 533 (Ericsson et al 1993), developing approaches to enhance the rate of learning is of interest 534 across a diverse range of fields such as sports, playing musical instruments, and learning 535 surgical skills.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…This calls into question the idea these aftereffects are an accurate representation of each individual subject's implicit adaptation. One possible explanation for this variability is the formation of a habit or proceduralization of learning (Hardwick et al 2019). Subjects may be attempting to suppress an explicit strategy that has become proceduralized over the five days of training.…”
Section: Figure 6 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%