1984
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(84)90675-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent effects of posttraining intrahippocampal injections of corticosterone on retention of appetitive learning tasks in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the present experiments provide additional evidence that posttraining activation of hippocampal GRs facilitates long-term storage of recently acquired information in a dose-dependent inverted-U manner (7,(25)(26)(27). The findings are consistent with evidence that the dentate gyrus and Ammon's horn have high densities of GRs (28)(29)(30) as well as the evidence that glucocorticoids affect hippocampal excitability and several forms of long-term neuroplasticity, putative mechanisms underlying learning and memory (31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The findings of the present experiments provide additional evidence that posttraining activation of hippocampal GRs facilitates long-term storage of recently acquired information in a dose-dependent inverted-U manner (7,(25)(26)(27). The findings are consistent with evidence that the dentate gyrus and Ammon's horn have high densities of GRs (28)(29)(30) as well as the evidence that glucocorticoids affect hippocampal excitability and several forms of long-term neuroplasticity, putative mechanisms underlying learning and memory (31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Importantly, stress and glucocorticoids are known to influence working memory especially under emotionally arousing test conditions, whereas the valence of the information acquired in working memory does not seem to be an important variable (36,37). Similarly, it is well established that glucocorticoids administered shortly before or after training enhance long-term memory of both appetitively and aversively motivated emotionally arousing training experiences (4,38,39). Thus, it is highly unlikely that, in the present experiments, GR agonist infusions into the mPFC induced opposite effects on these cognitive tasks simply because the two tasks differed in the type of reinforcement used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, inhibition of either training-induced glucocorticoid secretion (through adrenalectomy or by administration of inhibitors of glucocorticoid synthesis) or of its action through central glucocorticoid receptors (via administration of specific receptor antagonists) has proved to impair memory formation for a number of tasks, including passive avoidance (Roozendaal, Williams, & McGaugh, 1999), contextual fear conditioning (Cordero, Kruyt, Merino, & Sandi, 2002;, and spatial learning in the water maze (Akirav et al, 2004;Oitzl & de Kloet, 1992;Roozendaal, Bohus, & McGaugh, 1996;Roozendaal & McGaugh, 1997). Conversely, administration (systemic or central) of glucocorticoids or synthetic glucocorticoid receptor agonists either before or shortly after a particular learning task was repeatedly shown to facilitate subsequent retention for a variety of tasks, including passive avoidance (Cabib et al, 1996;Sandi, Rose, Mileusnic, & Lancashire, 1995), brightness discrimination (Micheau, Destrade, & Soumireu-Mourat, 1984), contextual fear conditioning Revest et al, 2005), eye-blink conditioning (Beylin & Shors, 2003) and water maze learning (Akirav et al, 2004;Sandi et al, 1997).…”
Section: Stressful Learning As a Model Of Intrinsic Stress And Ncammentioning
confidence: 99%