2003
DOI: 10.1086/374661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐dependent Ionization in Dynamic Solar and Stellar Atmospheres. I. Methods

Abstract: We propose a new numerical method to compute one-dimensional time-dependent wave propagation in stellar atmospheres that incorporates the time-dependent treatment of hydrogen ionization together with an evaluation of radiation losses under departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE). The method permits us to calculate acoustic waves and longitudinal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) tube waves. We have tested the method for the solar atmosphere by calculating the propagation of three types of waves, namely,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
38
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solar chromospheric models based on acoustic waves or longitudinal flux-tube waves are calculated using the numerical code by Rammacher & Ulmschneider (2003) and . This code allows one to compute one-dimensional time-dependent wave propagation in solar and stellar atmospheres, while incorporating the treatment of hydrogen ionization through solving the time-dependent statistical rate equations (see also Carlsson & Stein 1992, 1995 for another version of that method).…”
Section: (Magneto-)hydrodynamic Computer Codementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The solar chromospheric models based on acoustic waves or longitudinal flux-tube waves are calculated using the numerical code by Rammacher & Ulmschneider (2003) and . This code allows one to compute one-dimensional time-dependent wave propagation in solar and stellar atmospheres, while incorporating the treatment of hydrogen ionization through solving the time-dependent statistical rate equations (see also Carlsson & Stein 1992, 1995 for another version of that method).…”
Section: (Magneto-)hydrodynamic Computer Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models take into account the generation, propagation, and dissipation of the waves, as well as the description of emergent emission. Recent models for the Sun have been given by Rammacher & Ulmschneider (2003), Bogdan et al (2003), and Wedemeyer et al (2004). Simulations of chromospheric heating for stars other than the Sun by our group include models by Cuntz et al (1999), Fawzy et al (2002), and Rammacher & Cuntz (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For magnesium and calcium it is more important to include PRD and have a large temperature range than to include effects of non-equilibrium ionization and we choose the Bifrost 2D simulations. Non-equilibrium ionization is not important for calcium (Wedemeyer-Böhm & Carlsson 2011) while Rammacher & Ulmschneider (2003) and test-calculations with RADYN indicate that ionization/recombination times are as long as 100−500 s for magnesium and therefore of importance for the ionization balance. However, we will see that magnesium is almost exclusively in the form of Mg ii in the temperature range where magnesium is important for the cooling/heating of the chromosphere and the neglect of non-equilibrium ionization is therefore not important for the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a third numerical experiment, we used spectra generated from 1-D NLTE simulations done with the WAVE code (Rammacher & Ulmschneider 2003). The simulations were performed similar to Carlsson & Stein (1997) with a photospheric piston that excites acoustic waves of various types.…”
Section: Nlte 1-d Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%