Time‐Dependent Problems with the Boundary Integral Equation Method

Abstract

Time‐dependent problems that are modeled by initial‐boundary value problems for parabolic or hyperbolic partial differential equations can be treated with the boundary integral equation (BIE) method. The ideal situation is when the right‐hand side in the partial differential equation and the initial conditions vanish, the data are given only on the boundary of the domain, the equation is linear with constant coefficients, and the domain does not depend on time. In this situation, the transformation of the problem to a BIE follows the same well‐known lines as for the case of stationary or time‐harmonic problems modeled by elliptic boundary value problems. The same main advantages of the reduction to the boundary prevail: reduction of the dimension by one, and reduction of an unbounded exterior domain to a bounded boundary. There are, however, specific difficulties due to the additional time dimension. Apart from the practical problems of increased complexity related to the higher dimension, there can appear new stability problems. In the stationary case, one often has unconditional stability for reasonable approximation methods, and this stability is closely related to variational formulations based on the ellipticity of the underlying boundary value problem. In the time‐dependent case, instabilities have been observed in practice, but due to the absence of ellipticity, the stability analysis is more difficult and fewer theoretical results are available. In this chapter, the mathematical principles governing the construction of BIE methods for time‐dependent problems are presented. We describe some of the main numerical algorithms that are used in practice and have been analyzed in the mathematical literature.

Extension of the Lorenz–Mie–Debye method for electromagnetic scattering to the time-domain

“…In general, however, time-domain integral equations will be necessary (see, for example, [3,16,19]). …”

A Method of Fundamental Solutions in Poroelasticity to Model the Stress Field in Geothermal Reservoirs

“…According to [58], we can deduce single-and double-layer potentials from (4.57a) and (4.57b) to be Here, the values of the densities .y; / and .y; / are in R 4 , whereas values of .0/ .y/ and .0/ .y/ are in R. Indices i; k take values in f1; 2; 3g. Note that the boundary integral operators which can be defined based on these potentials will not be self adjoint, because the differential operator of the underlying differential equations is already not self adjoint.…”

“…Consider two separable Hilbert spaces V, H with V H topologically and algebraically and 58 3 Physical and Mathematical Foundation V dense in H. Let a.tI u; v/ be a family of bilinear forms on V with parameter t 2 OE0; t end , t end < 1. and Find Find a function t 7 ! u.t/, continuous for t > 0 in H with…”

“…58 Directions of the vector-valued poroelastic quantities u and v f for Example 6.9 evaluated on the square˝D . 1; 1/ 2 at time t D 5.…”

Hybrid K Based Influential Parameter Determination and Design Optimization of 220 kV High Voltage Insulator

“…Threedimensional electrical field calculated from the surface charge simulation method [1], [2] is used in designing optimal insulator. However, in [3] electromagnetic field is obtained using direct boundary element method. The finite element method in [4], [5] shows the electric field and the ion current density generated at the ground level due to the conductors.…”