2005
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time domain modelling of aeroelastic bridge decks: a comparative study and an application

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper has the purpose of describing, developing and comparing the formulae of aeroelastic forces in the time domain for the aerodynamic study of bridges. In particular, it considers the 'quasi-steady' formulation and the formulation 'derived from the extension of aeroelastic derivatives to the time domain' with the use of the recursive expression for the memory term. Both formulae are then applied to the analysis of 'stress ribbon' pedestrian bridges, aerodynamically similar to a thin airfoil immer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the crosssections considered in the design domain can be accepted as streamlined shapes, the quasi-steady theory formulation [10] can be applied to obtain the flutter derivatives from the aerodynamic coefficients of each shape. Therefore, under this assumption, the only required task is to obtain these aerodynamic coefficients.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Characterization Of a Single Box Deckmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the crosssections considered in the design domain can be accepted as streamlined shapes, the quasi-steady theory formulation [10] can be applied to obtain the flutter derivatives from the aerodynamic coefficients of each shape. Therefore, under this assumption, the only required task is to obtain these aerodynamic coefficients.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Characterization Of a Single Box Deckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, from the aerodynamic coefficients given by the surrogate model for each pair of shape design variables (H, B), the flutter derivatives of each design can be obtained using the quasi-steady theory [10,24], following the sign convention shown in figure 8 and according to the following expressions,…”
Section: Aeroelastic Response By Means Of the Quasi-steady Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A load defined by Equation (4), which is naturally suited for the frequency domain analysis, generally needs to be transformed in the time domain. Such transformation is not trivial (see for example Lazzari (2005)) and will not be discussed here. The interesting result is that Equation (4) can be substituted in the time domain by a relation of the type…”
Section: The Model Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also allow investigating the importance of the buffeting action in initializing the flutter of a given structure, e.g. Lazzari [14], or simulating the interaction of different cables subjected to different levels of stress.…”
Section: Fluid-structure Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%