2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2015.2449833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Domain System for Millimeter-Wave Material Characterization

Abstract: Time-domain material characterization using a leaky lens antenna and an in-house fabricated millimeter-wave wavelet generator using III-V technology is investigated. The wavelet generator produces short high-frequency pulses and is connected to a wideband and nondispersive leaky lens antenna. A purely timedomain methodology is used to extract the complex permittivity of nondispersive and nonmagnetic materials. The permittivity is found from the phase delay and the amplitude mismatch introduced by the object at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a lot of research activities have been aiming at improving the accuracy and sensitivity of material characterization, especially at frequencies below 50 GHz [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, very few contributions attempt to characterize dielectric and semiconductor materials at the millimeter-wave and THz frequency bands [18][19][20][21][22], [27], which are becoming increasingly important in various applications in sciences and engineering. Even so, there are currently only six commercial material characterization techniques available to date [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and only two of which are suitable at the frequencies above 50 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, a lot of research activities have been aiming at improving the accuracy and sensitivity of material characterization, especially at frequencies below 50 GHz [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, very few contributions attempt to characterize dielectric and semiconductor materials at the millimeter-wave and THz frequency bands [18][19][20][21][22], [27], which are becoming increasingly important in various applications in sciences and engineering. Even so, there are currently only six commercial material characterization techniques available to date [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and only two of which are suitable at the frequencies above 50 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, few research results have been published on dielectric material property characterization at millimeterwave and THz frequencies [18][19][20][21][22], [27]. These techniques include laminated waveguide [18], time-domain measurements [19], [22], microstrip ring resonators [20], and Frequency Selective Surface (FSS) filters [21]. Main key disadvantages of these methods include complicated setup (time domain), as well as design and fabrication complexities and costs, for examples laminated waveguide and ring resonator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three error terms: the input mismatch R 11 , the product of the transmission terms R 12 R 21 , and the output mismatch R 22 that have to be known to remove the influence of the error network by means of calibration, as can be seen from (6). In VNA calibration topics, this is commonly very wellknown as 3-term calibration.…”
Section: B Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on the dynamic range and contrast with the measurement result [4], [5], material characterization tasks are usually need to be performed with absolute exactness of the reflection magnitude and phase [6]. This is of special importance when free-space measurements are done, since the wave propagation from the antenna to the material under test (MUT) results in additional phase rotation and attenuation, which is hardly identified without further calibration measurements [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main methods of measurement are based on waveguide, free space or resonant cavity systems, in a variety of configurations [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Nevertheless, such methods are not the most appropriate for a reliable characterization of building materials, which typically present irregular shape, random porosity and lack of homogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%