2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.045110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: An algorithm from first principles

Abstract: A typical quantum state obeying the area law for entanglement on an infinite 2D lattice can be represented by a tensor network ansatz -known as an infinite projected entangled pair state (iPEPS) -with a finite bond dimension D. Its real/imaginary time evolution can be split into small time steps. An application of a time step generates a new iPEPS with a bond dimension k times the original one. The new iPEPS does not make optimal use of its enlarged bond dimension kD, hence in principle it can be represented a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that repeated application of time steps would result in an exponential growth of the bond dimension. Therefore, after each time step it is necessary to approximate the exact new iPEPS |ψ by an approximate iPEPS -representing a state |ψwith all bonds having the original bond dimension D. A straightforward optimization of the fidelity between the approximate |ψ and the exact |ψ is feasible 69 and, in principle, it should give the most accurate |ψ , but it is not the most efficient one.…”
Section: Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that repeated application of time steps would result in an exponential growth of the bond dimension. Therefore, after each time step it is necessary to approximate the exact new iPEPS |ψ by an approximate iPEPS -representing a state |ψwith all bonds having the original bond dimension D. A straightforward optimization of the fidelity between the approximate |ψ and the exact |ψ is feasible 69 and, in principle, it should give the most accurate |ψ , but it is not the most efficient one.…”
Section: Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the rank of the tensors used in the representation is determined by the physical problem, the amount of information they contain is determined by their bond dimension, D, which is used to control the accuracy of the ansatz. Although iPEPS were introduced originally for representing the ground states of local Hamiltonians, more recently several iPEPS methods have been developed for the representation of thermal states [36,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. Here we focus on the approaches discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Thermodynamics From Ipepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of finite-temperature tensor network algorithms in two-dimensions has been steadily developed and improved over the last ten years [19][20][21][22], and benchmarked on simple models as the quantum Ising model [20,21,23,24], the quantum compass model [25] or the Shastry-Sutherland Heisenberg model [26,27]. These methods are based on a parametrization of the thermal density operator (TDO) in terms of a Projected Entangled Pair Operator (PEPO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%