Time for a change: What dominance durations reveal about adaptation effects in the perception of a bi-stable reversible figure

Abstract

The effect of adaptation on the perception of a reversible figure was examined in the context of the socalled "reverse-bias effect" in which prolonged exposure to an unambiguous version of a bi-stable ambiguous stimulus serves to bias an observer to report the alternative version of the subsequently viewed ambiguous stimulus. Exposure to the unambiguous stimulus presumably selectively adapts and weakens the neural structures underlying that particular interpretation of the ambiguous figure. We extended previous research by examining the dominance durations for the two alternatives of the reversible figure (i.e., how long each alternative was perceived when it was dominant) in addition to the measures of response rate and choice preference used by other researchers. We replicated earlier findings with the previously used measures. Interestingly, adaptation with an unambiguous version of the ambiguous stimulus produced an asymmetrical effect on the dominance durations of the subsequently presented ambiguous stimulus, relative to a no-adaptation control. The dominance durations were lengthened for the perceptual organization that was the opposite of the adaptation stimulus while they were relatively unaffected for the perceptual organization that was the same as the adaptation stimulus. Our findings are consistent with the argument that adaptation effects play an important role in perceptual bistability. The asymmetrical dominance-duration findings further suggest that adaptation operates in a perceptual system in which the alternative perceptual representations of an ambiguous figure reciprocally inhibit one another via cross-inhibitory processes, consistent with views developed in other forms of bistable perception (e.g., binocular rivalry).

Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities

“…They have been explained as functions of the stimulus pre-exposure’s durations: Following the brief pre-exposure of an unambiguous version of the stimulus (up to 20 seconds), the observer is more likely to report the same configuration (priming) when perceiving the ambiguous stimulus. The opposite effect (adaptation) would follow after longer presentations (e.g., [ 24 , 26 ]).…”

Mona Lisa is always happy – and only sometimes sad

“…A huge amount of literature provides evidence for visual aftereffects, like priming and adaptation (for a specific example in the context of classical ambiguous figures see refs 31 and 32). In the case of adaptation, the focused observation for several seconds of an adapting stimulus containing certain stimulus features, biases perception of the subsequent test stimulus towards the opposite of the adaptation stimulus.…”

The three-second “subjective present”: A critical review and a new proposal.

“…Long and Toppino and Long (2015) used pre-exposure to an unambiguous version of the figure (i.e. a version that only fitted one of the two percepts) and…”