Time for Hume’s Unchanging Objects

Boehm, Miren; Cruz, Maité

doi:10.3998/phimp.1626

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They extend over temporally continuous intervals. Experience, contrary to what some authors have argued (Chuard, 2011), does not merely present us with how the world is at a moment, but rather, our perceptual processes represent the world as it is over a temporally extended interval (Grush, 2005; Lee, 2014; Phillips, 2010). Emotional experiences can be understood as having an experiential awareness of the unfolding of unified events that are the effect of a singular cause in the environment.…”

Section: Objectionsmentioning

confidence: 75%

Emotions in time: The temporal unity of emotion phenomenology

Goffin,

Viera

2023

Mind & Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to componential theories of emotional experience, emotional experiences are phenomenally complex in that they consist of experiential parts, which may include cognitive appraisals, bodily feelings, and action tendencies. These componential theories face the problem of emotional unity: Despite their complexity, emotional experiences also seem to be phenomenologically unified. Componential theories have to give an account of this unity. We argue that existing accounts of emotional unity fail and that instead emotional unity is an instance of experienced causal‐temporal unity. We propose that felt emotional unity arises from our experience of the temporal‐causal order of the world.

show abstract

Section: Objectionsmentioning

confidence: 75%

Emotions in time: The temporal unity of emotion phenomenology

Goffin,

Viera

2023

Mind & Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Experience content emerges through the person's subjective processing and sensemaking of inputs. Inputs have a beginning and an end; experiences also have a limited temporal duration (Kim 1992;Lee 2014). Experiences originate and exist in the moment of an input, so they are distinct from attitudes (i.e., general, stable beliefs and evaluations) and behaviors (i.e., how a person acts), both of which follow after an input (Chalmers 2010;Dretske 1993).…”

Section: A Fundamental Theory Of Experiencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Customer Experience: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Application in Omnichannel Environments

Gahler

Klein

Paul

2022

Journal of Service Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Managing customer experiences has become a key strategic priority for service research and management. Yet researchers and managers lack a customer experience (CX) measure that applies to the different experience partners, touchpoints, and journey stages in the omnichannel environments of today’s service industries. Without such a common measure, empirical research on CX remains fragmented, and service companies continue to struggle to improve customer interactions in customer journeys. To address this shortcoming, this article proposes an omnichannel-capable measurement of CX that applies to different customer interactions in the omnichannel environment. With seven studies, the authors develop and validate a six-dimensional, 18-item CX scale. The proposed CX scale overcomes the fragmentation of existing scales in service research and provides a valid measure that can be used consistently for various customer interactions in omnichannel environments. This article details how the proposed CX scale can monitor and compare CX for different interactions in customer journeys (i.e., pain-point analysis), as well as improve CX features and their marketing outcomes (i.e., CX profiling). By overcoming the existing fragmentation in available scales and providing a common omnichannel CX measure, this CX scale establishes an empirical foundation for developing CX knowledge and advancing related service research.

show abstract

“…According to non-dynamists there is no temporal flow. Defenders include Callender (2008), Lee (2014), Mellor (1981;1998), Paul (2010), Price (1997;), Prosser (2000. of time, and in doing so we come to believe that our world contains robust passage.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why do people represent time as dynamical? An investigation of temporal dynamism and the open future

Latham

Miller

2023

Philos Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Deflationists hold that it does not seem to us, in experience, as though time robustly passes. There is some recent empirical evidence that appears to support this contention. Equally, empirical evidence suggests that we naïvely represent time as dynamical. Thus deflationists are faced with an explanatory burden. If, as they maintain, the world seems to us in experience as though it is non-dynamical, then why do we represent time as dynamical? This paper takes up the challenge of investigating, on the part of the deflationist, one candidate explanation. We hypothesise that people’s belief that the future is what we call deliberatively open partly explains why they represent time as dynamical. In a series of two experiments we test this hypothesis. We find no evidence that beliefs about deliberative openness explain why people represent time as dynamical. Hence there remains an explanatory burden for the deflationist to discharge.

show abstract

Time for Hume’s Unchanging Objects

Cited by 5 publications

References 14 publications

Emotions in time: The temporal unity of emotion phenomenology

Emotions in time: The temporal unity of emotion phenomenology

Customer Experience: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Application in Omnichannel Environments

Why do people represent time as dynamical? An investigation of temporal dynamism and the open future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About