2019
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7120620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Integrated Flux Analysis: Exploiting the Concentration Measurements Directly for Cost-Effective Metabolic Network Flux Analysis

Abstract: Background: Flux analyses, such as Metabolic Flux Analysis (MFA), Flux Balance Analysis (FBA), Flux Variability Analysis (FVA) or similar methods, can provide insights into the cellular metabolism, especially in combination with experimental data. The most common integration of extracellular concentration data requires the estimation of the specific fluxes (/rates) from the measured concentrations. This is a time-consuming, mathematically ill-conditioned inverse problem, raising high requirements for the quali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation of the rates can be accomplished in two different ways, a differential or integral way. [ 41–44 ] Since the interest was in analyzing changes in the specific rates over time, the differential way was adopted here, following the best practice, [ 45,46,28 ] that is, Starting from the integrate version of the material balance (Equation (5)), the rate related terms were isolated on the right‐hand side since they cannot be measured: cnormalexti·Vticnormalext0·Vt0t0tiu·dt=t0tiq·x·V·dt Fit arbitrary time dependent functions (e.g., cubic smoothing splines, gaussian process models, polynomials or others), f ( t , w ), to approximate the measured quantities, ymfalse(tifalse)=cex,mfalse(tifalse)·Vnormalmfalse(tifalse)cex,mfalse(t0false)·Vnormalmfalse(t0false)t0tiunormalm·dt, such that the residual ɛ was small, though the function also does not overfit the data. ynormalm=ft,w+ε Build the derivative of f ( t , w ) analytically with respect to time, that is, dffalse(t,wfalse)dt Evaluate the derivative at the time instance t i at which the concentrations have been measured (assuming that the concentrations have the lowest measurement frequency) and divide by the approximated biomass ( x m ( t ) · V m ( t ) = g ( t , ω...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the rates can be accomplished in two different ways, a differential or integral way. [ 41–44 ] Since the interest was in analyzing changes in the specific rates over time, the differential way was adopted here, following the best practice, [ 45,46,28 ] that is, Starting from the integrate version of the material balance (Equation (5)), the rate related terms were isolated on the right‐hand side since they cannot be measured: cnormalexti·Vticnormalext0·Vt0t0tiu·dt=t0tiq·x·V·dt Fit arbitrary time dependent functions (e.g., cubic smoothing splines, gaussian process models, polynomials or others), f ( t , w ), to approximate the measured quantities, ymfalse(tifalse)=cex,mfalse(tifalse)·Vnormalmfalse(tifalse)cex,mfalse(t0false)·Vnormalmfalse(t0false)t0tiunormalm·dt, such that the residual ɛ was small, though the function also does not overfit the data. ynormalm=ft,w+ε Build the derivative of f ( t , w ) analytically with respect to time, that is, dffalse(t,wfalse)dt Evaluate the derivative at the time instance t i at which the concentrations have been measured (assuming that the concentrations have the lowest measurement frequency) and divide by the approximated biomass ( x m ( t ) · V m ( t ) = g ( t , ω...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%