2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:3(249)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Integration in Discontinuous Deformation Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analyses of existing data from earthquakes can provide suggested attenuation relationships for the regions at hand, on the basis of recorded data (see [1]). In some regions, however, recorded data are very scarce due to lack of instrumentation and seismic network infrastructure, and in all regions 465 provided by a time integration formulation similar to Newmark direct integration method with parameters = 0.5 and = 1.0, into the general equation of motion [18,19]. The result is a system of equations for solving the dynamic problem which, after collecting terms on both sides, typically expressed as:K D =F, where K i j is a 6×6 coefficient sub-matrix , D i is a 6×1 deformation matrix of block i and F i is a 6×1 loading matrix of block i. Sub-matrices [K ii ] depend on the material properties of block i and sub-matrices [Kij] are defined by the contacts between blocks i and j.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analyses of existing data from earthquakes can provide suggested attenuation relationships for the regions at hand, on the basis of recorded data (see [1]). In some regions, however, recorded data are very scarce due to lack of instrumentation and seismic network infrastructure, and in all regions 465 provided by a time integration formulation similar to Newmark direct integration method with parameters = 0.5 and = 1.0, into the general equation of motion [18,19]. The result is a system of equations for solving the dynamic problem which, after collecting terms on both sides, typically expressed as:K D =F, where K i j is a 6×6 coefficient sub-matrix , D i is a 6×1 deformation matrix of block i and F i is a 6×1 loading matrix of block i. Sub-matrices [K ii ] depend on the material properties of block i and sub-matrices [Kij] are defined by the contacts between blocks i and j.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus obvious that [13,14,16,18] both the average acceleration method ( = 1/4, = 1/2) and the constant acceleration method ( = 1/2, = 1) meet the unconditionally stable condition, while the linear acceleration method ( = 1/6, = 1/2) and the central difference method ( = 0, = 1/2) are the conditionally stable method. In general, the accuracy of Newmark method depends on the time interval, the physical parameters of the system, and the loading condition.…”
Section: Algorithmic Damping Of the Newmark Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doolin and Sitar [16] studied the time integration of DDA and noted that the algorithmic damping may be important considering the penalty formulation. Bao et al [17] obtained an equivalent damping ratio from the algorithmic damping in DDA using the cantilever beam model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth highlighting that an implicit time integration algorithm, i.e., the Newmark- method with two parameters =0.5 and r=1.0 is used in the traditional DDA [32] The numerical damping is essential for the DDA analysis, as it allows the oscillations caused by contact forces to dissipate rapidly, resulting in a stable state, which ultimately allows the open-close iteration to converge rapidly. The amount of numerical damping is also proportional to the time step size.…”
Section: Discontinuous Deformation Analysis (Dda)mentioning
confidence: 99%