This study investigated the effect of intermediate nursery illumination on circadian rhythm and sleep development of preterm infants. Preterm infants were randomly assigned to one of two intermediate nursery rooms: a dimly lighted room, the dim (control) group, or a day-night lighted room, the cycled (intervention) group. Continuous rectal temperature and sleep were recorded at 36 wk postconceptional age (before discharge) and at 1 and 3 mo corrected age at home. Preterm infants are exposed to continuous low or unpredictable high illumination for several weeks or months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and intermediate care nursery. These infants are deprived of several potentially important maternal entrainment factors (1-4). This lack of maternal input and exposure to random/unpredictable lighting in the nursery may hinder the development of sleep and circadian rhythms and may adversely influence clinical outcome (5). It is hypothesized that regular lighting in the nursery will improve circadian rhythm development and thereby enhance clinical outcome. Indeed, earlier studies have shown beneficial clinical effects of cycled light in the nursery (6 -8). However, the shortor long-term influences of light on development of circadian rhythm were not examined in these studies. A prospective randomized study was initiated to address the hypothesis that cycled light before discharge may improve circadian organization and sleep compared with continuous dim lighting.
METHODSPreterm infants who were admitted to our nursery at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford were eligible. Exclusion criteria were short stay (Ͻ10 d) and transfer to another hospital, major congenital malformations, intrauterine growth retardation, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, parenchymal injury including periventricular leukomalacia, prenatal infection, or substance abuse. When the clinical condition of an infant in the NICU was stable, he or she was transferred to the intermediate nursery and was randomly assigned to one of two groups: a dimly lighted room, the dim (control) group, or a day-night lighted room, the cycled (intervention) group. We assigned one room of our two-room intermediate care nursery to a continuous dim condition (dim room) in which the lighting remained low (below 20 lux) around the clock. The infant's incubator/bassinet was also covered by a nearly opaque blanket except during feeding or other interventions by parents and caregivers. This is the recommendation of the Neonatal Individualized Developmental Care Program (9), and during the time of this study, dim lighting 24 h/d was used as the standard practice at Stanford for all preterm infants. Infants in the cycled room also had their incubator/bassinet covered with the same type of blanket from 1900 h to 0700 h; however, the blanket was removed from 0700 h to 1900 h, at which time the room lighting was also turned up to standard lighting levels (approximately 300 lux) to produce a regular light-dark cycled condi-