2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03159-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-limited role of the hippocampus in the memory for trace eyeblink conditioning in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
80
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings can be contrasted with the results that have typically been observed after hippocampal damage in tasks of nonspatial memory such as trace eyeblink conditioning (Kim et al, 1995;Takehara et al, 2002Takehara et al, , 2003, social transmission of food preference (Winocur, 1990;Winocur et al, 2001;Clark et al, 2002), and in tasks other than the water maze that appear to have a spatial component, such as contextual fear conditioning (Kim and Fanselow, 1992;Anagnostaras et al, 1999), but that do not require the animal to navigate to a specific point in space (for a discussion of this issue, see Clark et al, 2005). In all the studies just cited, as well as in others (for review, see Squire et al, 2004), hippocampal lesions made soon after training impaired performance, and lesions made at a later time had no effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…These findings can be contrasted with the results that have typically been observed after hippocampal damage in tasks of nonspatial memory such as trace eyeblink conditioning (Kim et al, 1995;Takehara et al, 2002Takehara et al, , 2003, social transmission of food preference (Winocur, 1990;Winocur et al, 2001;Clark et al, 2002), and in tasks other than the water maze that appear to have a spatial component, such as contextual fear conditioning (Kim and Fanselow, 1992;Anagnostaras et al, 1999), but that do not require the animal to navigate to a specific point in space (for a discussion of this issue, see Clark et al, 2005). In all the studies just cited, as well as in others (for review, see Squire et al, 2004), hippocampal lesions made soon after training impaired performance, and lesions made at a later time had no effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In trace eyeblink conditioning, the hippocampus is required for both acquisition (Solomon et al 1986;Moyer et al 1990;Beylin et al 2001) and retention of a recently acquired memory, but not of a remotely acquired one (Kim et al 1995;Takehara et al 2002Takehara et al , 2003a. These results suggest that the hippocampus is important for the early processes of memory (acquisition and consolidation), but the later processes (storage and retrieval) are mediated by other brain areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this circuitry is reorganized after the CR has been completely acquired. Retention of a recently acquired CR is mediated mainly by the hippocampus (Kim et al 1995;Takehara et al 2002Takehara et al , 2003a and the cerebellum (Woodruff-Pak et al 1985;Takehara et al 2003a), but only marginally by the mPFC (Powell et al 2001;Takehara et al 2003a). Retention of a remotely acquired CR is mediated by the mPFC and the cerebellum (Takehara et al 2003a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these tasks, inactivation of the hippocampus impairs memory retrieval shortly after learning, but has no effect when performed weeks or months later (Kim and Fanselow 1992;Anagnostaras et al 1999;Clark et al 2002;Takehara et al 2002Takehara et al , 2003Maviel et al 2004;Ross and Eichenbaum 2006;Lesburgueres et al 2011;Tayler et al 2013; but see Clark et al 2005;Sutherland et al 2010). In addition, several regions of the neocortex become more important for memory retrieval with the passage of time.…”
Section: Animal Models Of Systems Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%