2001
DOI: 10.1080/10578310210398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Motion Analysis and Physiological Profile of Canadian World Cup Wheelchair Basketball Players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
49
2
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
49
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Key determinants of mobility performance are the abilities of the athlete to accelerate, sprint, brake and turn with the wheelchair (de Witte, Hoozemans, Berger, Veeger, & van der Woude, 2016;Mason, Porcellato, van der Woude, & Goosey-Tolfrey, 2010). The actual mobility performance in wheelchair court sports should be assessed during a match, preferably by systematic (video) observation combined with the use of (inertial) sensors (Bloxham, Bell, Bhambhani, & Steadward, 2001;de Witte et al, 2016;Rhodes, Mason, Perrat, Smith, & Goosey-Tolfrey, 2014; Van der Slikke, Berger, Bregman, & Veeger, 2015). These observations and measurements during wheelchair basketball result in, for example, findings that players move across the field with light or no arm strokes for 24% (SD 7) of the time (Bloxham et al, 2001) and that national standard players drive relatively more forward, while international standard players perform more rotational movements during a match (de Witte et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Key determinants of mobility performance are the abilities of the athlete to accelerate, sprint, brake and turn with the wheelchair (de Witte, Hoozemans, Berger, Veeger, & van der Woude, 2016;Mason, Porcellato, van der Woude, & Goosey-Tolfrey, 2010). The actual mobility performance in wheelchair court sports should be assessed during a match, preferably by systematic (video) observation combined with the use of (inertial) sensors (Bloxham, Bell, Bhambhani, & Steadward, 2001;de Witte et al, 2016;Rhodes, Mason, Perrat, Smith, & Goosey-Tolfrey, 2014; Van der Slikke, Berger, Bregman, & Veeger, 2015). These observations and measurements during wheelchair basketball result in, for example, findings that players move across the field with light or no arm strokes for 24% (SD 7) of the time (Bloxham et al, 2001) and that national standard players drive relatively more forward, while international standard players perform more rotational movements during a match (de Witte et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual mobility performance in wheelchair court sports should be assessed during a match, preferably by systematic (video) observation combined with the use of (inertial) sensors (Bloxham, Bell, Bhambhani, & Steadward, 2001;de Witte et al, 2016;Rhodes, Mason, Perrat, Smith, & Goosey-Tolfrey, 2014; Van der Slikke, Berger, Bregman, & Veeger, 2015). These observations and measurements during wheelchair basketball result in, for example, findings that players move across the field with light or no arm strokes for 24% (SD 7) of the time (Bloxham et al, 2001) and that national standard players drive relatively more forward, while international standard players perform more rotational movements during a match (de Witte et al, 2016). Assessing mobility performance is a fundamental requirement for trainers and coaches to, for example, develop training schemes, to discuss and improve the athlete's level of performance, to detect strength and weaknesses of mobility performance and to develop optimal wheelchair configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propulsive actions were classified as positive accelerations and negative accelerations were considered indicative of braking activity. Bloxham et al (2001) The studies above showed differences in mobility performance between players in general, but important aspects like functional classification, game related aspects and field position are not taken into account. All players are awarded from 1 (minimal functional potential) to 4.5 points (maximal functional potential) on an ordinal functional level scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical properties and capabilities of an athlete, often measured with indicators such as heart rate, oxygen uptake and blood lactate, determine the physical performance (Bloxham et al, 2001). Finally, what the athlete does (or can do) with a wheelchair can be referred to, as mobility performance (Mason et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation