2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.86.012111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-of-arrival probabilities for general particle detectors

Abstract: We develop a general framework for the construction of probabilities for the time of arrival in quantum systems. The time of arrival is identified with the time instant when a transition in the detector's degrees of freedom takes place. Thus, its definition is embedded within the larger issue of defining probabilities with respect to time for general quantum transitions. The key point in our analysis is that we manage to reduce the problem of defining a quantum time observable to a mathematical model where tim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(98 reference statements)
4
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(34) applies only to factorized initial states, and not to general states that are described by Eq. (24). This means that the dephasing is strictly derived only for such states.…”
Section: Validity Of the Equivalence Principle For Composite Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(34) applies only to factorized initial states, and not to general states that are described by Eq. (24). This means that the dephasing is strictly derived only for such states.…”
Section: Validity Of the Equivalence Principle For Composite Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the measured quantity is the time of arrival, while the location of the particle detector is fixed. Despite the existence of ambiguities in the definition for quantum time-of-arrival probabilities [22,23], it is now possible to construct time-ofarrival probability measures for general Hamiltonians [24], using a method that can be straightforwardly applied to free-falling particles. However, the method involves more complex techniques of quantum measurement theory.…”
Section: Position Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of the arrival time of a quantum mechanical particle in a given detection region is a longstanding and fundamental problem in quantum mechanics [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. In spite of much effort, the construction of a time operator has been found to be controversial [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going in a different direction, there are studies in both non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics promoting the role of time to an observable [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Particularly, it was calculated that the TOA operator for a nonrelativistic particle with mass m 0 is −m 0T−1,1 [4,5], where theT m,n 's form a complete and linearly independent set called the Bender-Dunne operators [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], a proper time operator was found for a relativistic electron and was used to study some properties of several position operators. And in [16], a method for constructing TOA probabilities valid for any experimental setup (including relativistic systems with interactions described by QFT) was developed. They associated the TOA of a particle as the time instant when there is a transition in the degrees of freedom of the detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%