2016
DOI: 10.1111/eth.12569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐of‐Day Discriminative Learning: Contrasting the Use of Spatial Compared to Feature Information in Homing Pigeons (Columba livia)

Abstract: This study examined time‐of‐day associative learning to either spatial or feature information in homing pigeons in an open‐field, laboratory setting. Homing pigeons are well known for their navigational abilities and generally have been shown to rely more heavily on spatial than nonspatial cues in recognizing a goal. However, during goal localization, homing pigeons also successfully use nonspatial, feature information. Homing pigeons were divided into two groups and were trained to locate two time‐of‐day depe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
(85 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, in comparison to the pigeons trained to space, the feature-trained birds were more likely to make correct first choices. These findings seem out of alignment with previous bird studies that demonstrate a spatial preference when both cues are simultaneously available (see above), or better performance with spatial, rather than feature, control of goal-directed behavior (Sizemore & Bingman, 2016). This leads to the question, why did discrimination based on space yield worse performance?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…4, in comparison to the pigeons trained to space, the feature-trained birds were more likely to make correct first choices. These findings seem out of alignment with previous bird studies that demonstrate a spatial preference when both cues are simultaneously available (see above), or better performance with spatial, rather than feature, control of goal-directed behavior (Sizemore & Bingman, 2016). This leads to the question, why did discrimination based on space yield worse performance?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%