2003
DOI: 10.1784/insi.45.9.600.52932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) technique for accurate sizing of cracks embedded in sub-cladding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time of Flight Diffraction is a well established technique in ultrasonic NDT working on the principle of diffraction from the tips of the cracks [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Fig.…”
Section: Time Of Flight Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time of Flight Diffraction is a well established technique in ultrasonic NDT working on the principle of diffraction from the tips of the cracks [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Fig.…”
Section: Time Of Flight Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental observations with respect to through thickness height of the simulated cracks obtained by radiography, SAFT and TOFD are shown in Table 4. The TOFD measurements carried out on the same blocks, in a separate study have been used for comparison (8) . Comparing the results of SAFT and TOFD, it was found that defects smaller than 2mm in height have been oversized by TOFD.…”
Section: Figure 5: Experimental Set Up Of Saftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct idea of sizing the surface-breaking crack in ultrasonic testing is to measure the flight time of the diffracted echoes and calculate the crack depth with the knowledge of the geometry of the component, this has led to the development of the Impulse-Echo-Technique (IET) and the Time of Flight Diffraction Technique (TOFD). Shiuh-Chuan Her et al [6], [7] applied the IET to conduct the through-wall detection of the surface-breaking cracks, while Baby et al [8] evaluated the depth of the surface-breaking crack on the far surface using the TOFD. The results of their work showed that these methods can achieve a good accuracy for a crack larger than one wavelength but have a poor performance for the cracks smaller than one wavelength [6], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shiuh-Chuan Her et al [6], [7] applied the IET to conduct the through-wall detection of the surface-breaking cracks, while Baby et al [8] evaluated the depth of the surface-breaking crack on the far surface using the TOFD. The results of their work showed that these methods can achieve a good accuracy for a crack larger than one wavelength but have a poor performance for the cracks smaller than one wavelength [6], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%