2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time of Progression to Osteopenia/Osteoporosis in Chronically HIV-Infected Patients: Screening DXA Scan

Abstract: BackgroundAlgorithms for bone mineral density (BMD) management in HIV-infected patients are lacking. Our objective was to assess how often a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan should be performed by assessing time of progression to osteopenia/osteoporosis.MethodsAll DXA scans performed between 2000 and 2009 from HIV-infected patients with at least two DXA were included. Time to an event (osteopenia and osteoporosis) was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Strata (tertiles) were defined using basel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall 26% prevalence of frank osteoporosis in our HIV-cohort was higher than the percentages reported in a previous meta-analysis and in other European case studies [1,3,24]. In our HIV/HCV co-infected patients osteoporosis prevalence was significantly higher than among HIV mono-infected subjects, in agreement with previous findings [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The overall 26% prevalence of frank osteoporosis in our HIV-cohort was higher than the percentages reported in a previous meta-analysis and in other European case studies [1,3,24]. In our HIV/HCV co-infected patients osteoporosis prevalence was significantly higher than among HIV mono-infected subjects, in agreement with previous findings [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For patients who progressed to osteopenia, osteoporosis was often diagnosed approximately 1 year later. Older age was associated with faster progression in each category of BMD [58]. Therefore, the recommended monitoring interval would be as frequent as every 1-2 years after a diagnosis of low BMD (advanced osteopenia), and 6-7 years in those at low risk of rapid progression of bone loss (Table 5); however, if a new fragility fracture or the development of a major osteoporosis risk factor occurs, monitoring should be carried out more frequently (2-3 years) [58,59].…”
Section: How Often Should Hiv Patients Be Monitoredmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Older age was associated with faster progression in each category of BMD [58]. Therefore, the recommended monitoring interval would be as frequent as every 1-2 years after a diagnosis of low BMD (advanced osteopenia), and 6-7 years in those at low risk of rapid progression of bone loss (Table 5); however, if a new fragility fracture or the development of a major osteoporosis risk factor occurs, monitoring should be carried out more frequently (2-3 years) [58,59]. There is insufficient evidence to recommend more frequent screening among HIV-infected patients who are receiving ART medications associated with bone loss (tenofovir DF or PIs).…”
Section: How Often Should Hiv Patients Be Monitoredmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…HIV-1 [14][15][16][17] HIV-1 HIV-1 18-20 21 HIV-1 [18][19][20] HIV-1 HIV-1 21 HIV-1 [22][23][24] HIV-…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%