This committee was appointed by the SPR Board to provide recommendations for publishing data on electrodermal activity (EDA). They are intended to be a stand-alone source for newcomers and experienced users. A short outline of principles for electrodermal measurement is given, and recommendations from an earlier report (Fowles et al., 1981) are incorporated. Three fundamental techniques of EDA recording are described: (1) endosomatic recording without the application of an external current, (2) exosomatic recording with direct current (the most widely applied methodology), and (3) exosomatic recording with alternating current-to date infrequently used but a promising future methodology. In addition to EDA recording in laboratories, ambulatory recording has become an emerging technique. Specific problems that come with this recording of EDA in the field are discussed, as are those emerging from recording EDA within a magnetic field (e.g., fMRI). Recommendations for the details that should be mentioned in publications of EDA methods and results are provided.Descriptors: Electrodermal measurement, Skin potential, Skin conductance, Skin admittance, Laboratory and field recording Changes in the electrical activity of palmar and plantar skin, being concomitants of psychological phenomena, can be regarded as one of the origins of psychophysiological recording. Galvanic skin responses or, as called later by a more general term, electrodermal responses (collectively designated as electrodermal activity or EDA) were observed as early as in the last two decades of the 19th century (for an historical overview, see Neumann & Blanton, 1970), at a time when recordings of human electroencephalogram (EEG) were yet unknown. Since then, both phasic and tonic EDA measures have been used extensively in psychophysiological research for a large variety of purposes, and their usage continues even in recent years where the main focus of psychophysiological research has shifted to more direct observations of brain functions.Over time, a great variety of methods for recording EDA were developed, and a wealth of studies using them in various fields of application have been around for considerably more than half a century. Publication standards recommended in 1981 by a committee appointed by the then editor of this journal (Fowles et al., 1981) have been updated by the present committee, taking into account methodological developments of the past 30 years.The committee opted for making these recommendations a stand-alone source, enabling readers to get all information they will need for setting up their own EDA recording and evaluation procedures. Those who want to go into more details or get more information on the origins of EDA and fields of EDA application are referred to the Dawson, Schell, and Filion (2007) chapter in the Handbook of Psychophysiology edited by Cacioppo, Tassinary, and Berntson and to a recently updated handbook on EDA (Boucsein, 2012).