2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0727-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Perspectives and Subjective Wellbeing in Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other instrument used was the Zimbardo’s Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI: Zimbardo and Boyd [40]), consisting of 56 items that refer to five factors: two related to the present (hedonistic, fatalistic), two to the past (positive, negative), and one to the future. This instrument was adapted to the Spanish population by Diaz-Morales [48], and has worked well with Spanish-speaking young people and adults in this and other contexts [47,49,50,51,52]. The items in the ZTPI use a Likert scale with five response options (ranging from 1 to 5, from “does not describe me at all” to “very characteristic”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other instrument used was the Zimbardo’s Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI: Zimbardo and Boyd [40]), consisting of 56 items that refer to five factors: two related to the present (hedonistic, fatalistic), two to the past (positive, negative), and one to the future. This instrument was adapted to the Spanish population by Diaz-Morales [48], and has worked well with Spanish-speaking young people and adults in this and other contexts [47,49,50,51,52]. The items in the ZTPI use a Likert scale with five response options (ranging from 1 to 5, from “does not describe me at all” to “very characteristic”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several proposals for analysis of this idea of balance or equilibrium, which can be summed up as: having a higher score for past-positive, future, and present-hedonistic, and a lower one for past-negative and present-fatalistic TPs [42]; or displaying low scores for dysfunctional orientations (past-negative and present-fatalistic), high scores for the functional orientations (past-positive and future), and a moderate score for the present-hedonistic orientation [39,47]. In general, the form of measurement used to account for TP is the scale developed by Zimbardo and Boyd [40], which has applications in various countries [47]; in Spain, see the validation carried out by Diaz-Morales [48] and research by different authors [49,50,51,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, studies on the relationship between a balanced time perspective and psychological well-being in Chile showed the relativity of the BTP construct. According to researchers, BTP is age-related (Worrell, McKay, & Andrett, 2015) and depends on the social and cultural context (Güell, Orchard, Yopo, & Jamne-Molina, 2015). Webster and Ma (2013) report that, on average, younger adults are inclined to be future-oriented rather than past-oriented, while an average adult tends to be past-rather than future-oriented.…”
Section: Balanced Time Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was shown, in order to achieve the highest well-being, a balanced time perspective is the optimal one (Boniwell, 2005;Boniwell et al, 2010;Drake et al, 2008;Gao, 2011;Güel et al, 2015;Sobol-Kwapinska and Jankowski, 2016;Stolarski and Cyniak-Cieciura, 2016;Stolarski et al, 2014;Webster et al, 2014;Webster and Ma, 2013;Wiesman et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2012). Therefore, the third aim of this study is to verify whether the balanced time perspective also correlates with job satisfaction and predicts it beyond personality traits, demographic variables and separate time perspective dimensions.…”
Section: Aims Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The most optimal time perspective to achieve the highest well-being is supposed to be a balanced time perspective (Boniwell, 2005;Boniwell et al, 2010;Drake et al, 2008;Gao, 2011;Güel et al, 2015;Sobol-Kwapinska and Jankowski, 2016;Stolarski and Cyniak-Cieciura, 2016;Stolarski et al, 2014;Webster et al, 2014;Webster and Ma, 2013;Wiesman et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2012). Zimbardo and Boyd (2008) define it as low past-negative and present-fatalistic dimensions and moderate or high positive-past, present-hedonistic and future dimensions; and Boniwell (2005) proposes it as a more positive alternative to living life as a slave to any particular temporal bias, so that people with a balanced time perspective are able to adapt their temporal mode to the situations they find themselves in.…”
Section: Well-being Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%