Background and Purpose
4D DSA is a time resolved technique providing allows viewing of a contrast bolus at any time and from any desired viewing angle. Our hypothesis was that the information content in a 4D DSA reconstruction was essentially equivalent to that in a combination of 2D acquisitions and a 3D DSA reconstruction.
Materials and Methods
26 consecutive patients who had both 2D and 3D DSA acquisitions were included in the study. The angiography report was used to obtain diagnosis and characteristics of abnormalities. Diagnosis included AVM/AFS, aneurysms, stenosis and normal. 4D DSA reconstructions were independently reviewed by 3 experienced observers who had no part in the clinical care. Using an electronic evaluation form these observers recorded their assessments based only on the 4D reconstructions. The clinical evaluations were then compared with the 4D evaluations as to diagnosis and lesion characteristics.
Results
Results showed both Interrater and interclass agreements (κ 0.813 and 0.858). Comparing the 4D diagnosis with the clinical diagnosis for the 3 observers yielded Kappa values of (0.906, 0.912, 0.906). The κ for agreement between the 3 observers as to type of abnormality were 0.949, 0.845, 0.895. Complete agreement on the presence of an abnormality between the clinical and 4D DSA was complete in 23/26 cases. In 2 cases there was conflicting opinions.
Conclusion
In this study, the information content of 4D DSA reconstructions was largely equivalent to that of the combined 2D/3D studies. Availability of 4D DSA should reduce the requirement for 2D DSA acquisitions.