2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.033202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Resolved Measurement of Interatomic Coulombic Decay Induced by Two-Photon Double Excitation of Ne2

Abstract: The hitherto unexplored two-photon doubly-excited states [Ne * (2p −1 3s)]2 were experimentally identified using the seeded, fully coherent, intense extreme ultraviolet free-electron laser FERMI. These states undergo ultrafast interatomic Coulombic decay (ICD) which predominantly produces singly-ionized dimers. In order to obtain the rate of ICD, the resulting yield of Ne + 2 ions was recorded as a function of delay between the XUV pump and UV probe laser pulses. The extracted lifetimes of the long-lived doubl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] to associate the position of the maximum of the cross-correlation function to the shift of the peak being sought. In our work [1] it was not necessary to include a shift; while Equation (5) could be used to estimate the signal amplitude α, it is preferable to use the autocorrelation instead:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[5] to associate the position of the maximum of the cross-correlation function to the shift of the peak being sought. In our work [1] it was not necessary to include a shift; while Equation (5) could be used to estimate the signal amplitude α, it is preferable to use the autocorrelation instead:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S is the quantity reported in our work ( [1] note for the sake of exactness that in Figure 2a therein, the unity baseline was not subtracted); we want to determine which scans to include in the average, and their weights w k . From Equation (6) and Figure 1b we can estimate the signal-to-noise ratio as:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations