2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/785/1/52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TIME RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY OF SGR J1550–5418 BURSTS DETECTED WITHFERMI/GAMMA-RAY BURST MONITOR

Abstract: We report on time-resolved spectroscopy of the 63 brightest bursts of SGR J1550-5418, detected with Fermi/Gamma-ray Burst Monitor during its 2008-2009 intense bursting episode. We performed spectral analysis down to 4 ms time-scales, to characterize the spectral evolution of the bursts. Using a Comptonized model, we find that the peak energy, E peak , anti-correlates with flux, while the low-energy photon index remains constant at ∼ −0.8 up to a flux limit F ≈ 10 −5 erg s −1 cm −2 . Above this flux value the E… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
28
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For SGR1806-20 we find that the temperatures of the low-kT BB vs highkT BB are best fit with a broken power law (BPL) with the break located at ∼ 4 and 11 keV. This result is consistent with the time-resolved spectroscopy of GBM bursts from SGR 1550-5418 [10]. Other SGRs distributions do not require BPL and show only a positive correlation between the low-and high-kTs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For SGR1806-20 we find that the temperatures of the low-kT BB vs highkT BB are best fit with a broken power law (BPL) with the break located at ∼ 4 and 11 keV. This result is consistent with the time-resolved spectroscopy of GBM bursts from SGR 1550-5418 [10]. Other SGRs distributions do not require BPL and show only a positive correlation between the low-and high-kTs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, we note that the flux range analyzed by Younes et al 2014 for SGR J1550−5418 (above 10 −6.5 erg/cm 2 /s) is much higher from the flux range covered in our investigation (∼ 10 −9 − 10 −8 erg/cm 2 /s). It is possible that the area vs. kT behavior of the two blackbody components differ more significantly with increasing flux than previously discussed or that the relationship differs between sources or burst episodes.…”
Section: Bb+bb Modelcontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The dashed lines represent the R 2 ∝ T −3 trend proposed in previous studies (e.g. Israel et al 2008;Younes et al 2014) and the solid line represents the R 2 ∝ T −4 trend that is expected from blackbody emission. These trends are drawn for comparison only.…”
Section: Bb+bb Modelmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Due to the lack of bursting behavior, SGR J1550-5418 was initially classified as an AXP [17]. In 2008 the source began its burst-active episodes and hundreds of bursts have been observed by several instruments, including the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) and Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) [18][19][20][21][22]. The source shares SGRlike behavior with SGRs 1806-20, 1900+14 and 1627-41.…”
Section: −10mentioning
confidence: 99%