2021
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015729118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-resolved turbulent dynamo in a laser plasma

Abstract: Understanding magnetic-field generation and amplification in turbulent plasma is essential to account for observations of magnetic fields in the universe. A theoretical framework attributing the origin and sustainment of these fields to the so-called fluctuation dynamo was recently validated by experiments on laser facilities in low-magnetic-Prandtl-number plasmas (Pm<1). However, the same framework proposes that the fluctuation dynamo should operate differently when Pm≳1, the regime relevant to many astrop… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we see a degree of large-scale coherence in the amplified field that might help reconcile the view that the saturated dynamo must result in outer-scale magnetic fields [42,[51][52][53][54][55] and some previous indications, numerical and theoretical, that it produces fields whose energy resides on Rm-dependent scales [16-18, 59, 60]. This may also be a step towards simulations becoming more consistent with Faraday-rotation observations of magnetic fields in galaxy clusters suggesting kpc-scale coherence [61,62], as well as recent laboratory laser-plasma experiments exhibiting a Pm 1 fluctuation dynamo [63,64]. Determining whether or not this result holds when using the pressure-anisotropic MHD [39,65] or kinetic [66,67] descriptions more appropriate to the weakly collisional intracluster medium awaits future work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, we see a degree of large-scale coherence in the amplified field that might help reconcile the view that the saturated dynamo must result in outer-scale magnetic fields [42,[51][52][53][54][55] and some previous indications, numerical and theoretical, that it produces fields whose energy resides on Rm-dependent scales [16-18, 59, 60]. This may also be a step towards simulations becoming more consistent with Faraday-rotation observations of magnetic fields in galaxy clusters suggesting kpc-scale coherence [61,62], as well as recent laboratory laser-plasma experiments exhibiting a Pm 1 fluctuation dynamo [63,64]. Determining whether or not this result holds when using the pressure-anisotropic MHD [39,65] or kinetic [66,67] descriptions more appropriate to the weakly collisional intracluster medium awaits future work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…By recording the wavelength shift of the backscattered light from a probe beam, we infer v turb ≈ 200 km/s. The self-generated magnetic fields were estimated from proton deflectometry to be B RMS ≈ 0.8( B path,∥ /25 kG cm)(𝓁 B /100 μm) 1/2 (𝓁 n /2 mm) 1/2 MG (here B path,∥ is the one component of the magnetic field that we measure), where we took the proton path length 𝓁 n from self-emission x-ray images ( 19 , 20 ), and the magnetic field correlation length, 𝓁 B , corresponds to a wavelength ∼4𝓁 B ≈ 400 μm of the same order as the grid periodicity. Using the same diagnostic, we found the maximum field to be B max ≳ 3 MG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 for details of the experimental setup. The platform is similar to that already used at other laser facilities [e.g., the Omega laser ( 19 , 20 )] but with ∼30 times more energy delivered to the target. A highly turbulent plasma was created by ablating two doped plastic foils, each with 133 kJ of 351 nm light in 15 ns (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ancillary to future measurements that will explore the mechanisms behind the observed return current, and further interrogate the magnetic field structure in the LPP, we are executing a simulation campaign using the FLASH code 32 . FLASH is a parallel, multi-physics, adaptive-meshrefinement, finite-volume Eulerian hydrodynamics and radiation MHD code, whose capabilities 38 through benchmarks and code-to-code comparisons 39,40 , as well as through direct application to laser-driven laboratory experiments 38,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] .…”
Section: Numerical Modeling With Flashmentioning
confidence: 99%