1992
DOI: 10.1080/07418829200091261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-series analysis of the female percentage of arrests for property crimes, 1960–1985: A test of alternative explanations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, subsequent quantitative analyses of these same data, primarily by Steffensmeier (1980Steffensmeier ( , 1982 and his colleagues (Steffensmeier and Allen, 1988;Steffensmeier and Cobb, 1981 ;Steffensmeier and Steffensmeier, 1980;Steffensmeier and Streifel, 1992;Steffensmeier et al, 1979Steffensmeier et al, , 1989, but also by others (Hartnagel, 1982;Simon and Baxter, 1989;Widom and Stewart, 1986), led to the demise of these theories as relevant explanations for female offending. Simply put, the continuing evidence of stability in women's rates of violent offending combined with the lack of evidence that gender-role socialization was related to female offending (see, e.g., Grasmick et aL, 1984;Norland et al, 1981) led scholars to focus on a new set of explanatory hypotheses which would address the increases in property offending among women.…”
Section: Theory Development In the Gender-ratio Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subsequent quantitative analyses of these same data, primarily by Steffensmeier (1980Steffensmeier ( , 1982 and his colleagues (Steffensmeier and Allen, 1988;Steffensmeier and Cobb, 1981 ;Steffensmeier and Steffensmeier, 1980;Steffensmeier and Streifel, 1992;Steffensmeier et al, 1979Steffensmeier et al, , 1989, but also by others (Hartnagel, 1982;Simon and Baxter, 1989;Widom and Stewart, 1986), led to the demise of these theories as relevant explanations for female offending. Simply put, the continuing evidence of stability in women's rates of violent offending combined with the lack of evidence that gender-role socialization was related to female offending (see, e.g., Grasmick et aL, 1984;Norland et al, 1981) led scholars to focus on a new set of explanatory hypotheses which would address the increases in property offending among women.…”
Section: Theory Development In the Gender-ratio Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies identified economic marginality as an alternative cause of increased crime rates among females. Steffensmeier and Streifel (1992) conducted one study that confronted the problem of measuring liberation versus economic marginalization. The results showed very little support for the liberation hypothesis and some support for the economic marginalization hypothesis.…”
Section: Economic Marginalization and Liberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En fait, il semble que la pauvreté demeure la cause principale de la criminalité féminine et la « féminisation de la pauvreté » entraîne une augmentation de la criminalité de type acquisitif (Steffensmeier, 1993 ;Heimer, 2000 ;Holtfreter et al, 2004 ;Société Elizabeth Fry du Québec, 2011). De plus, les crimes à caractère économique peuvent être considérés comme une réponse rationnelle des femmes à leur pauvreté et leur insécurité économique (Steffensmeier et Streifel, 1992). La recherche démontre que des taux élevés de divorce, la monoparentalité des femmes, et d'autres indicateurs d'un faible statut socioéconomique des femmes sont liés à l'augmentation de certains types de délits, dont le vol à l'étalage (Steffensmeier, 1993 ;Holtfreter et al, 2004).…”
Section: Féminisation De La Pauvretéunclassified