2024
DOI: 10.3390/app14051960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Series Feature Selection Method Based on Mutual Information

Lin Huang,
Xingqiang Zhou,
Lianhui Shi
et al.

Abstract: Time series data have characteristics such as high dimensionality, excessive noise, data imbalance, etc. In the data preprocessing process, feature selection plays an important role in the quantitative analysis of multidimensional time series data. Aiming at the problem of feature selection of multidimensional time series data, a feature selection method for time series based on mutual information (MI) is proposed. One of the difficulties of traditional MI methods is in searching for a suitable target variable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to observe the influence of different independent variables on the output variable, linear and non-linear relationship analyses were conducted using the mu-tual_info_regression method, this method quantifies the interdependence of two variables, a higher mutual information suggests a stronger correlation between the variables [49]. Unlike the linear correlation coefficient, mutual information is sensitive to dependencies that may not be apparent in the covariance [50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to observe the influence of different independent variables on the output variable, linear and non-linear relationship analyses were conducted using the mu-tual_info_regression method, this method quantifies the interdependence of two variables, a higher mutual information suggests a stronger correlation between the variables [49]. Unlike the linear correlation coefficient, mutual information is sensitive to dependencies that may not be apparent in the covariance [50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%