2010
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.20150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐shared NMR experiments

Abstract: Details on the implementation of the simultaneous evolution of multiple frequencies into the same time period of a NMR pulse sequence are introduced. Timeshared (TS) versions of the most useful inverse 2D NMR experiments (TS-HMBC, TS-HSQC, TS-HSQC-TOCSY, and TS-HSQMBC) are presented and illustrated for simultaneous acquisition of 1 H/ 13 C and 1 H/ 15 N NMR spectra. The major benefits associated to the parallel acquisition of multiple spectra from a single NMR experiment are spectrometer time savings and the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed methods can also be modified by implementing the time-shared (TS) evolution concept (see pulse sequence details in the Supporting Information). [17] For instance, the simultaneous measurement of small Figure 4 shows a practical example after selection of the H6 proton in 2. Figure 4A shows the pure IP TS-selHSQMBC spectrum where all cross-peaks belonging to spectra are shown superimposed and slightly shifted for the sake of clarity.…”
Section: H-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed methods can also be modified by implementing the time-shared (TS) evolution concept (see pulse sequence details in the Supporting Information). [17] For instance, the simultaneous measurement of small Figure 4 shows a practical example after selection of the H6 proton in 2. Figure 4A shows the pure IP TS-selHSQMBC spectrum where all cross-peaks belonging to spectra are shown superimposed and slightly shifted for the sake of clarity.…”
Section: H-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More and detailed information about the general concepts, experimental details, and successful implementation of the TS concepts in conventional NMR experiments are found in the supporting information and Ref. [17].…”
Section: H-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we present HMQC experiments implemented by combining a single SS 90° 1 H pulse with two non-selective 1 H 180° pulses such that 1 H magnetization outside of the selectively excited slice is returned to the z-axis before signal detection. Specifically, we implemented (i) simultaneous [20] 2D [ 13 C methyl / 15 N, 1 H] HMQC (referred to as sim-HMQC in this paper) and (ii) constant time ( ct ) [21] 2D [ 13 C methyl , 1 H] HMQC ( ct -HMQC). Applications of sim-HMQC are presented for U-[ 13 C, 15 N]-labeled 7.6 kDa protein ubiquitin as well as for U-[ 2 H, 13 C, 15 N]-labeled, but isoleucine, leucine, valine (ILV) methyl protonated [22] 7.5 kDa Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG; http://www.nesg.org) target GmR137.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instrumental improvements, isotope labeling schemes (Lundstrom et al 2012) and developments in pulse sequences (Diercks and Orekhov 2005; Farmer 1991; Frueh et al 2009; Kay et al 1990; Kay et al 1992; Kern et al 2008; Lescop et al 2007; Parella and Nolis 2010; Perez-Trujillo et al 2007; Sattler et al 1995; Schanda and Brutscher 2005; Schanda et al 2007; Szyperski et al 1996) can shorten the time for data acquisition and improve the spectral quality, thus partially compensating the growing sample complexity. Several interesting concepts such as time-shared NMR (Farmer 1991; Kay et al 1990; Kay et al 1992; Parella and Nolis 2010; Perez-Trujillo et al 2007; Sattler et al 1995), BEST (Lescop et al 2007) and SOFAST (Kern et al 2008; Schanda and Brutscher 2005; Schanda et al 2007) techniques, have been developed to use the available magnetization more effectively. In addition, the usage of a second receiver allows parallel signal acquisition of different nuclei (Chakraborty et al 2012; Kupce et al 2006; Kupce and Kay 2012; Kupce et al 2010; Moore et al 1991; Reddy and Hosur 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%