2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71069-3_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Space Complexity Advantages for Quantum Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, standard classical computers have bit values restricted to either 0 and 1, or True and False, and therefore are only able to represent one state at a time [12]. Quantum computers -which make use of parallel processing and quantum mechanical properties to bypass these restrictions -have emerged as new contenders for finding alignments [13].…”
Section: A Tool For Problem Solving: Quantum Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That is, standard classical computers have bit values restricted to either 0 and 1, or True and False, and therefore are only able to represent one state at a time [12]. Quantum computers -which make use of parallel processing and quantum mechanical properties to bypass these restrictions -have emerged as new contenders for finding alignments [13].…”
Section: A Tool For Problem Solving: Quantum Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the absolute supremacy of quantum computers over their classical counterparts is yet unproven [14], they have two key properties whose partnership make computation on quantum systems especially advantageous: one, parallel processing and, two, entanglement. The parallel processing capabilities come from the ability for the quantum bits to be in a probabilistic suspension between the bit values, or in a superimposed state [13]. This phenomenon allows for an exponential number of solutions to be simultaneously represented [12].…”
Section: A Tool For Problem Solving: Quantum Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, Kondacs and Watrous [8], and Moore and Crutchfield [9] proposed the concept of quantum automata separately. Since then, a variety of quantum automata models have been studied and demonstrated in various directions, such as QFAs, Latvian QFA, 1.5-way QFA, two-way QFA (2QFA), quantum sequential machine, quantum pushdown automata, quantum Turing machine, quantum multicounter machines, quantum queue automata [10], quantum multihead finite automata, QFAs with classical states (2QCFA) [11,12], state succinctness of two-way probabilistic finite automata (2PFA), QFA, 2QFA, and 2QCFA [13][14][15], interactive proof systems with QFAs [16,17], quantum finite state machines of matrix product state [18], promise problems recognition by QFA [19][20][21][22], quantum-omega automata [23] and semi-quantum two-way finite automata [24][25][26], time complexity advantages of QFA [27], nonuniform classes of polynomial size QFA [28,29], QFA and linear temporal logic relationship [30], and many more since the past 2 decades [31][32][33][34]. These models are effective in determining the boundaries of various computational features and expressive power [35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%