2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to Abandon the Term “3 in 1” Block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Same as FNB but a larger volume of LA is deposited, approximately 20-40 mL of LA. 9 Evidence. A prospective observational study has shown that 3in-1 block inconsistently blocks the ON (4% chance of blocking the ON).…”
Section: -In-1 Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Same as FNB but a larger volume of LA is deposited, approximately 20-40 mL of LA. 9 Evidence. A prospective observational study has shown that 3in-1 block inconsistently blocks the ON (4% chance of blocking the ON).…”
Section: -In-1 Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis has not been confirmed and subsequent MRI studies have shown that there is a lateral and medial spread of local anaesthetic after injection, but not cephalad. It has been suggested that the block should better be referred to as '2 in 1' and the term '3 in 1' should be abandoned, as the obturator nerve is rarely blocked [14]. The femoral, obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves can be blocked independently with USG guidance instead of a '3 in 1' block.…”
Section: '3 In 1' Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial dye and X-ray studies showed that placement of an index finger below the needle insertion point assists LA solution movement into the natural gutter between the quadratus lumborum, psoas, and iliacus muscles but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved otherwise (27). The terminology is under question and needs to be abandoned (28).…”
Section: The "3 In 1" Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%