2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to death and the forecasting of macro-level health care expenditures: Some further considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast a Dutch study examining macro level data suggests that accounting for PTD may not simply reduce future projections of HCE due to growth from other unidentified causes which were not included in previous modelling attempts [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast a Dutch study examining macro level data suggests that accounting for PTD may not simply reduce future projections of HCE due to growth from other unidentified causes which were not included in previous modelling attempts [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Other studies have reported that ageing is more important [12], that proximity to death is minor in magnitude [12], or indeed a proxy for disability [13]. Van Baal and Wong [14] suggest that PTD may be a better predictor of expenditure than age as it includes both age and mortality risk. There remains general consensus on a PTD effect, what is contentious is the magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To what extent this results in an overestimate or underestimate of the threshold is difficult to assess. Second, we have not been able to deal with-or test for-potential reverse causality, which may stem from the fact that most spending occurs in the last years before death, implying that (conditional on age) lower mortality rates should be accompanied by lower health care spending (van Baal & Wong, 2012). Hence, reverse causality would mean that our estimate of the impact of health spending on mortality is an underestimate and the k-threshold estimate is an overestimate.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…These estimates are roughly in line with findings from previous studies. For example, Riley and Lubitz [24] found that the 5 % of decedents account for about 25 % of total Medicare expenditures, which implies that decedents spend about six times as much as survivors; van Baal and Wong [32] estimate a factor even as high as 20.…”
Section: Main Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%