2013
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2013.794964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to follow commands remains the most useful injury severity variable for predicting WeeFIM® scores 1 year after paediatric TBI

Abstract: Objective To investigate the relationship between injury severity variables, particularly time to follow commands (TFC) and long-term functional outcomes in paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods and procedure Participants included 40 children with moderate-to-severe TBI discharged from inpatient rehabilitation. Measures of severity were initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, TFC, duration of Post Traumatic Amnesia (PTA) and total duration of impaired consciousness (TFC + PTA). Functional outcome was me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
56
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The prognostic significance of command following at admission is consistent with prior work demonstrating the importance of time to follow commands for predicting outcome among broader groups of children with TBI. 18,19 These data must be interpreted within the context of understanding that individuals with MCS− and MCS+ fall into the broader category of consciousness consistent with MCS, which is associated with more favorable outcome among individuals with DOC. [5][6][7] Further work to examine the prognostic significance of the distinction of MCS− versus MCS+ is needed, although our data suggest that, among children with TBI, there is initial support for the use of command following as a predictor for emergence to CS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic significance of command following at admission is consistent with prior work demonstrating the importance of time to follow commands for predicting outcome among broader groups of children with TBI. 18,19 These data must be interpreted within the context of understanding that individuals with MCS− and MCS+ fall into the broader category of consciousness consistent with MCS, which is associated with more favorable outcome among individuals with DOC. [5][6][7] Further work to examine the prognostic significance of the distinction of MCS− versus MCS+ is needed, although our data suggest that, among children with TBI, there is initial support for the use of command following as a predictor for emergence to CS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other investigators have employed DFQs for TBI studies. 8,9 In brief, DFQs provide a quotient score based on age-norm scores, ranging from 14 (lowest possible quotient for a patient who receives a score of 1 in all domains and for whom the age-norm is 7) to more than 100 (a patient who performs at a level that exceeds the age-norm). DFQs are provided by UDSMR ® for all patients who were assessed using the WeeFIM ® instrument.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 15 % of children who experience a TBI will have moderate or severe injuries that include a period of decreased responsiveness [4]. Longer time to recovery from disorders of consciousness is predictive of worse prognosis after TBI [5, 6], and some reports suggest that shortening the period of disordered consciousness may improve outcomes, at least in part by increasing participation in rehabilitation treatment [7, 8]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%