2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to invasive airway placement and resuscitation outcomes after inhospital cardiopulmonary arrest

Abstract: Background-Clinicians often place high priority on invasive airway placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The benefit of early versus later invasive airway placement remains unknown. In this study we examined the association between time to invasive airway (TTIA) placement and patient outcomes after inhospital cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a registry study of 25 006 in-hospital cardiac arrests, earlier time to invasive airway (Ͻ5 minutes) was not associated with improved ROSC but was associated with improved 24-hour survival. 31 In an urban out-of-hospital setting, intubation that was achieved in Ͻ12 minutes was associated with better survival than intubation achieved in Ն13 minutes. 32 In out-of-hospital urban and rural settings, patients intubated during resuscitation had a better survival rate than patients who were not intubated, 33 whereas in an in-hospital setting, patients who required intubation during CPR had a worse survival rate.…”
Section: Advanced Airwaysmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a registry study of 25 006 in-hospital cardiac arrests, earlier time to invasive airway (Ͻ5 minutes) was not associated with improved ROSC but was associated with improved 24-hour survival. 31 In an urban out-of-hospital setting, intubation that was achieved in Ͻ12 minutes was associated with better survival than intubation achieved in Ն13 minutes. 32 In out-of-hospital urban and rural settings, patients intubated during resuscitation had a better survival rate than patients who were not intubated, 33 whereas in an in-hospital setting, patients who required intubation during CPR had a worse survival rate.…”
Section: Advanced Airwaysmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…32 In a registry study of 25 006 in-hospital cardiac arrests, earlier time to advanced airway (Ͻ5 minutes) was not associated with increased ROSC but was associated with improved 24-hour survival. 31 In out-of-hospital urban and rural settings, patients intubated during resuscitation had better survival rates than patients who were not intubated. 33 In an in-hospital setting patients requiring intubation during CPR had worse survival rates.…”
Section: Advanced Airwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…80 In this study, earlier time to invasive airway (Ͻ5 minutes) was associated with no improvement in ROSC but improved 24-hour survival (NNTϭ48). In an urban out-of-hospital setting, intubation in Ͻ12 minutes was associated with better survival than intubation Ն13 minutes.…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 59%
“…For in-hospital SCD, intubation within 5 minutes (compared with intubation performed Ͼ5 minutes after arrest) has been associated with either worse outcome or a slight increase in 24-hour survival without increased ROSC. 85,86 Out-of-hospital data are more heterogeneous: Both intubation (regardless of timing) and intubation within 12 minutes have been associated with improved survival in retrospective studies. 87,88 On the other hand, studies assessing minimally interrupted cardiac resuscitation and passive ventilation suggest that intubation may not be advantageous.…”
Section: Timing Of Airway Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%