2015
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to return to full training is delayed and recurrence rate is higher in intratendinous (‘c’) acute hamstring injury in elite track and field athletes: clinical application of the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification

Abstract: This study describes the clinical application of the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification. Different categories of hamstring injuries had different TRFT and recurrence rate. Hamstring injuries that extend into the tendon ('c') are more prone to re-injury and delay TRFT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
216
4
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
18
216
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In these groups, we have found a mean time to RTP of 28 and 22 days. Pollock et al 7 investigated hamstring injuries in track and field athletes and presented separate data for different grades with tendon involvement. They reported a mean TRFT of up to 84 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these groups, we have found a mean time to RTP of 28 and 22 days. Pollock et al 7 investigated hamstring injuries in track and field athletes and presented separate data for different grades with tendon involvement. They reported a mean TRFT of up to 84 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, 25% of the central tendon injuries were surgically repaired. Pollock et al 7 retrospectively analysed outcome for track and field athletes with injuries graded according to the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification 6. Compared with myofascial or musculotendinous injury, the 15 intratendinous injuries took significantly longer to return to full training and had a reinjury rate of up to 63%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is questionable if these exacerbations of symptoms should be regarded as a re-injury or require another definition. Additional analysis by Pollock et al ,15 after communication with them, and with exclusion of these cases with exacerbations of symptoms instead of a ‘real’ re-injury, still showed a statistically significant association for classification according to the British Muscle Injury Classification and intratendinous injuries with re-injury. In the study of Silder et al ,18 only two of the four described re-injuries were ‘real’ re-injuries after RTP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There was no statistically significant difference in the number of lesions located at the musculotendinous junction, myofascial, mixed, tendon-bone and proximal tendon between these groups. Pollock et al 15 categorised the injury location as proximal, central and distal injuries and they did not find an association between this classification and re-injury.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation