Article deals with
overview and some implications of European Court of Justice's (CJEU) judgments
in Danish Beneficial Ownership cases. In six jointed cases, right to witholding
tax exemption, according to EU Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and Parent
and Subsidiary Directive (PSD) in cases of abusive tax practices, has been
questioned. Among other things, within two judgments, CJEU puts special
attention to the relationship between beneficial ownership concept and general EU
principle of abuse of law. By specifying the concept of the beneficial
ownership in detail, relying heavily on OECD’s guidelines and international tax
practice, and providing specific indicia for identifying abusive practices, the
Court brings these two concepts into the relationship of interplay.
Furthermore, by interpreting the EU general abuse of law principle, CJEU
eliminates the need for national or treaty-based anti-abuse provisions, by
which, in fact, confirms the principle of the prohibition of abusive tax
practices as a direct expression of the general legal principle of abuse of
law. In addition to making a further step in the development of this principle
in Union law, the paper will show that the new, or upgraded, mechanism
presented by these judgments represents logical sequence of the trend and
doctrine developed by earlier Court judgments, but at the same time a clear
indication of the Union's political commitment in the fight against
international tax avoidance.