2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60491-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

36
1,367
9
42

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,935 publications
(1,477 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
36
1,367
9
42
Order By: Relevance
“…Human rtPA is the only thrombolytic treatment of ischemic stroke and leads to improvement of the clinical outcome in stroke patients despite an increase in the incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage. 9 In addition to its thrombolytic activity, rtPA could interact with different receptors in the brain, such as the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, 19 the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 20 or annexin II, 21 resulting in parenchymal cell injury. Cerebral ischemia studies performed with tPA-deficient animals have clearly underlined that endogenous tPA has a role in brain infarction and BBB dysfunction as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human rtPA is the only thrombolytic treatment of ischemic stroke and leads to improvement of the clinical outcome in stroke patients despite an increase in the incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage. 9 In addition to its thrombolytic activity, rtPA could interact with different receptors in the brain, such as the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, 19 the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 20 or annexin II, 21 resulting in parenchymal cell injury. Cerebral ischemia studies performed with tPA-deficient animals have clearly underlined that endogenous tPA has a role in brain infarction and BBB dysfunction as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That was possibly explained by a more careful selection of patients over 80 years old who were adequate candidates to IV-rtPA, given that shorter time to treatment increases benefit and decreases risk, 28 and taking into account the more dubious safety/benefit profile of these patients. Another possible contributing explanation may be the geographical context of the hospital with an elderly population living near the hospital, consequently having a quicker access.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rt‐PA has been shown to improve outcomes of survival and independence 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15. However, its use is limited by the very short window of opportunity for treatment and risk of bleeding, making less than 6% of stroke patients eligible for such treatment 16, 17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%