2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03743-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time trends in treated incidence, sociodemographic risk factors and comorbidities: a Finnish nationwide study on anxiety disorders

Abstract: Background There has been a lack of research about the time trends and socio-demographic risk factors for children and adolescents who receive treatment for anxiety disorders. This study aimed to fill these gaps in our knowledge by examining a nationwide sample of Finnish children and adolescents diagnosed in specialized healthcare settings. Methods This study comprised national register data of all singleton children born in Finland from 1992–2006… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this exclusion may also have affected how comparable the subjects and controls were to each other and how representative these results were of the general Finnish population. The cumulative incidence of anxiety disorders diagnosed by specialized health care was 5.7% from 1992 to 1996 [ 59 ], so it is unlikely that excluding controls with these diagnoses would have explained the results completely. When we used sensitivity analyses to compare the siblings of subjects with SM that did not have comorbid anxiety disorders or childhood onset emotional disorders to the siblings of the controls, most of the same diagnostic group differences remained significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this exclusion may also have affected how comparable the subjects and controls were to each other and how representative these results were of the general Finnish population. The cumulative incidence of anxiety disorders diagnosed by specialized health care was 5.7% from 1992 to 1996 [ 59 ], so it is unlikely that excluding controls with these diagnoses would have explained the results completely. When we used sensitivity analyses to compare the siblings of subjects with SM that did not have comorbid anxiety disorders or childhood onset emotional disorders to the siblings of the controls, most of the same diagnostic group differences remained significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%