2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0003975606000117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Use Surveys: a Review of their Aims, Methods, and Results

Abstract: Le propre des enquêtes sur les emplois du temps est de faire appel à un dispositif de questionnement spécifique, le carnet quotidien d'activités, mis au point dans l'U.R.S.S. des années 1920, standardisé dans le cadre du programme multinational d'enquêtes dirigé par Alexandre Szalai en 1965–66, et ensuite généralisé à un trés grand nombre de pays. Le carnet permet de quantifier les durées d'activités faiblement institutionnalisées telles que, notamment, le travail domestique et les loisirs.Les principaux résul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Light diaries may be a simpler, self-instructing instrument, and are a sufficient alternative method for respondents that are able to read but not write. Time diaries have their critics as well: Chenu and Lesnard (2006) argue that time diaries are also exposed to normative bias by the underreporting of “extra-occupational” activities like flirting or drinking.…”
Section: Section 2 Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Light diaries may be a simpler, self-instructing instrument, and are a sufficient alternative method for respondents that are able to read but not write. Time diaries have their critics as well: Chenu and Lesnard (2006) argue that time diaries are also exposed to normative bias by the underreporting of “extra-occupational” activities like flirting or drinking.…”
Section: Section 2 Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In addition, researchers have found that open-ended recall methods that do not cap hours tend to overestimate time use. Hawes et al (1974), Verbrugge and Gruber-Baldine (1993) and Robinson and Godbey (1999) all find that the average daily (or weekly) activity times summed to greater than 24 (or 168) hours, although Chenu and Lesnard (2006) find evidence of underreporting of hours using the recall method.…”
Section: Section 2 Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Quantitative methods such as questionnaires and surveys capture qualitative information in formalised ways for computational processing, and are widely used in large scale studies on demographics, household economics and social attitudes (e.g., [11,12]). Time-use diaries are also used to log activity sequences [13], and to seek evidence of life changes and social evolution [14]. Efforts to harmonise time use surveys across Europe have delivered guidelines (HETUS) [15] on activity coding for analysing the time use data, but interviews and observations are commonly used to cross-validate what goes on, and to calibrate and amplify the meaning of the diary evidence, including the use of activity sensors and video cameras [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%