Time‐Varying Capital Requirements and Disclosure Rules: Effects on Capitalization and Lending Decisions

Abstract

We investigate how banks' capital and lending decisions respond to changes in bank-specific capital and disclosure requirements. We find that an increase in the bank-specific regulatory capital requirement results in a higher bank capital ratio, brought about via less asset risk. A decrease in the requirement implies more lending to firms but also less Tier 1 capital and higher bank leverage. We do not observe differences between confidential and public disclosure of capital requirements. Our results empirically illustrate a tradeoff between bank resilience and a fostering of the economy through more bank lending using banks' capital requirement as policy instrument.JEL codes: G21, G28

The Effects of Higher Bank Capital Requirements on Credit in Peru

“…Other papers focus on the heterogenous effect of higher capital requirements on distinct types of loans. Using data for Denmark, Imbierowicz et al (2018) show that banks retrench more from loans with higher risk weights. Using U.K. data, Bridges et al (2014) show that banks reduce most the growth of their commercial real estate lending, then corporate lending and, finally, personal lending.…”

Are bank capital requirements optimally set? Evidence from researchers’ views

“…20 The large strand of the literature that has investigated potential effects of higher capital requirements on loan supply include e.g. Hancock and Wilcox, 1998;Conti et al, 2018;De Jonghe et al, 2019;Deli and Hasan, 2017;Eickmeier et al, 2018;Fraisse et al, 2017;Glancy and Kurtzman, 2018;Imbierowicz et al, 2018;Kanngiesser et al, 2019;Meeks, 2017;Uluc and Wieladek, 2018;Tolo and Miettinen, 2018. At least a short-term negative effect on loan supply of higher capital requirements may be due to their positive effect on bank funding costs (Schmidt, 2019).…”

The Market Impact of Systemic Risk Capital Surcharges

“…On the one hand, the announcement of a reallocation to a higher bucket could simply mean that the bank might have lower projected income in the future, since raising new equity is costly. This could, in turn, indicate more intrusive supervision by the authorities and higher perceived risk in markets (Imbierowicz, Kragh, and Rangvid (2018)). A further possible explanation is that the announcement is an update of information on the systemic importance of the bank, and that, investors would like to hedge against this specific increase in systemic risk in their portfolios by purchasing CDS.…”