2010
DOI: 10.1177/1475921710379520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-varying inverse filtering of narrowband ultrasonic signals

Abstract: Active strategies for structural health monitoring using ultrasonic guided waves mainly deal with excitation signals that are band limited in order to minimize the effect of dispersion. The underlying idea is to activate only the fundamental wave modes so that the signal complexity decreases and individual wave packets in the sensor signals can be identified separately. However, it would be advantageous to increase the temporal resolution of the signal in order to enhance the performance of the post-processing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By means of a suitable dictionary it is possible to apply the method to fiber-reinforced structures, too. In the framework of SHM, deconvolution of guided wave signals have been demonstrated in [17,18]. In the context of ultrasound non-destructive testing (NDT) several sparse deconvolution strategies have been proposed [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of a suitable dictionary it is possible to apply the method to fiber-reinforced structures, too. In the framework of SHM, deconvolution of guided wave signals have been demonstrated in [17,18]. In the context of ultrasound non-destructive testing (NDT) several sparse deconvolution strategies have been proposed [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more PZTs and higher-performance equipment are required, adding the experiment cost. Besides, some filtering methods are applied to improve the SNR, such as a Fourier filter [29,30], a Morlet wavelet filter [21,31], an adaptive filter [32], a comb filter [33], a Kalman filter [34][35][36], an extended Kalman filter [37,38], a particle filter [39][40][41], a time-varying inverse filter [42], a polynomial-smoothing filter [43,44], and an optimally matched filter [45]. These methods can weaken the noise signal to a certain extent, but the effective signals are simultaneously weakened.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MP is a greedy algorithm that finds the best match for a signal in from an over-complete and redundant dictionary. This method has already been reported for guided wave inspection and defect characterization [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. However, the majority of the efforts in MP for guided wave inspection have neglected the dispersive nature of guided waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of the efforts in MP for guided wave inspection have neglected the dispersive nature of guided waves. Some scholars have reported utilizing Chirplet Matching Pursuit and tried to estimate the dispersion by chirp functions [ 31 , 33 , 34 ]. Despite being effective, these methods suffer from mathematical complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%