2022
DOI: 10.2113/2022/6306861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Varying Response Analysis of Surrounding Rock Construction Mechanics of a Double-Arch Tunnel without a Middle Pilot Tunnel and Suggestions for Tunnel Construction

Abstract: This research carries out the model test and numerical simulation, studying the time-varying response regularity of surrounding rock construction mechanics. The purpose was to ensure the construction safety of a double-arch tunnel without a middle pilot tunnel and to prevent rockburst or large deformations of surrounding rock in a stress concentration areas. To resist shear deformation of the steel arch of the first tunnel, during construction of the secondary lining of the lower step of the following tunnel n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was conducted because, in the actual project, the distance from the palm surface of the following tunnel blasting excavation to the supporting structure of the first tunnel was especially close, and if it were not optimized for the gun holes in the following tunnel, the blasting excavation of the following tunnel would have damaged the supporting structure of the first tunnel, thus leading to cracking of the supporting structure of the concrete and to the occurrence of a safety accident. As such, the two rows of gun holes in the following tunnel near the first tunnel were omitted (they were about 1.9 m) 1 . (c) The charge of some of the auxiliary holes in the upper left step of the following tunnel of holes was changed to the same charge as that of the peripheral holes, i.e., a single-hole charge of 0.6 kg; thus, there was a reduction in the charge by 56%.…”
Section: Optimization Of Blasting Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was conducted because, in the actual project, the distance from the palm surface of the following tunnel blasting excavation to the supporting structure of the first tunnel was especially close, and if it were not optimized for the gun holes in the following tunnel, the blasting excavation of the following tunnel would have damaged the supporting structure of the first tunnel, thus leading to cracking of the supporting structure of the concrete and to the occurrence of a safety accident. As such, the two rows of gun holes in the following tunnel near the first tunnel were omitted (they were about 1.9 m) 1 . (c) The charge of some of the auxiliary holes in the upper left step of the following tunnel of holes was changed to the same charge as that of the peripheral holes, i.e., a single-hole charge of 0.6 kg; thus, there was a reduction in the charge by 56%.…”
Section: Optimization Of Blasting Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How the destruction of rock occurs and the specific manner in which it is damaged is closely related to the microstructure and macro mechanics of rock; as such, the macro mechanics should be fully considered when defining the damage variables of rock. Therefore, when defining the damage variables of rocks, we should start by considering the following two aspects: (1) The damage of rocks is determined by the expansion and development of cracks, which are often only observable from a microscopic point of view. As such, we should consider factors such as the number, length, and volume of cracks [33][34][35] .…”
Section: Definitional Theory Of Perimeter Rock Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations