Timeline errors undermine hypothesis; ‘famous patient’ did have secondary osteogenic sarcoma and tuberculosis

Reply (to Dr Ian Gawler)

“…We thank Ian Gawler 1 for his letter and will answer the queries he raises that are not covered in our response to his current wife, Ruth Gawler.…”

The MJA and Gawler: a case of self‐censorship?

“…The authors challenged evidence used by Ian Gawler on his website (http://iangawler.com) and in his book 2 to support meditation and dietary interventions as cancer therapy. Publication of the article was subsequent to initial submission to the Medical Journal of Australia , whose editors at first accepted the article but later rejected it on the grounds that Gawler did not consent to publication of the study 3 . Could the editors of the MJA please inform its readers and authors why they chose to reject the article?…”