2013
DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timeliness of Analysts' Forecasts: The Information Content of Delayed Forecasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, our concept of timeliness is based on calendar time, where timeliness declines as each day passes. This differs from the leader-follower relation examined by Cooper et al (2001) and Shroff et al (2013), who classify analysts as leaders if their forecasts prompt a string of forecasts by other analysts (followers). Cooper et al (2001) find that leaders have a larger price impact than followers.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, our concept of timeliness is based on calendar time, where timeliness declines as each day passes. This differs from the leader-follower relation examined by Cooper et al (2001) and Shroff et al (2013), who classify analysts as leaders if their forecasts prompt a string of forecasts by other analysts (followers). Cooper et al (2001) find that leaders have a larger price impact than followers.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Cooper et al (2001) find that leaders have a larger price impact than followers. Shroff et al (2013) find that followers' forecasts also affect stock prices, because they convey private information, and reaffirm leaders' information, and conclude that both leaders and followers contribute to price discovery. The leader-follower relation is based on the idea that followers quickly issue their forecasts after the release of a forecast by a leader but not after other followers release forecasts; it does not predict whether a leader or a follower issues an early forecast in calendar time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Shroff et al . () show that analysts on average have 4.05 years of firm experience. In Knill et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the absence of actual earnings). I choose the current context because existing archival studies Tse 2003, 2005;Shroff et al 2011; Zhuang 2011) have documented some evidence, though inconclusive, on the effects of forecast timing and boldness on investors' reactions in the current period (before accuracy is known), but we know little about whether and how the effects of the two forecast characteristics carry over to influence investors' reactions in the subsequent period (after accuracy is known). Third, in my study, a moderate boldness salience forecast is bold in terms of the magnitude relative to the consensus, and is confirmed by other analysts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%