1984
DOI: 10.2307/2490700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timeliness of Reporting and the Stock Price Reaction to Earnings Announcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
321
4
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 587 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
30
321
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Chambers and Penman (1984), firms that do not announce earnings early send signals of negative news and thus earn negative pre-announcement and post-announcement abnormal returns. These arguments therefore may provide some explanation for the results we have found in this study.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findings and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Chambers and Penman (1984), firms that do not announce earnings early send signals of negative news and thus earn negative pre-announcement and post-announcement abnormal returns. These arguments therefore may provide some explanation for the results we have found in this study.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findings and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market regulators and policy makers need to impose penalties on companies that delay the release of their results. According to Chambers and Penman (1984), firms that do not announce earnings early, send negative signals to market participants, and this may result in speculative investment behaviour. Timely release of financial information therefore is expected to help discourage unnecessary speculation by investors while it attracts investors, boosts liquidity and helps improve the informational efficiency of the stock market.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies also suggest that the earlier the earnings are reported, the higher the return because announcing earnings earlier (later) than expected is, on the average, viewed positively (negatively) by the market (Chambers & Penman, 1984;Kross & Schroeder, 1984;Begley & Fischer, 1998). The value of information from an audited financial statement will decline as the announcement of earnings is delayed because older information is considered to have decreasing relevance (FASB, 1980).…”
Section: A Good News Early and Bad News Latementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Prior studies have examined the timing of earnings announcement and the sign sign of the earnings news, and they generally find that good news is announced early and bad news late (e.g., Kross, 1981;Givoly & Palmon, 1982;Chambers & Penman, 1984;Kross & Schroeder, 1984;Begley & Fischer, 1998;Haw et al, 2003;Kothari et al, 2005). Career concerns like promotion, employment opportunities within and outside the firm, and loss of employment can motivate managers to withhold bad news and seek an opportunity such as subsequent corporate events (i.e., future corporate turnaround or restructuring) to bury the bad news (Kothari et al, 2005).…”
Section: A Good News Early and Bad News Latementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation