IEEE INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications 2018
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2018.8486337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timely-Throughput Optimal Scheduling with Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the prediction window size is zero, i.e., when there is no prediction, the corresponding total average arrival queue backlog size of all EFNs is Dividing both sides by i∈N λ i and using Little's theorem, we obtain (27). Next, we prove (28). Taking the limit of W (W → ∞), we obtain…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the prediction window size is zero, i.e., when there is no prediction, the corresponding total average arrival queue backlog size of all EFNs is Dividing both sides by i∈N λ i and using Little's theorem, we obtain (27). Next, we prove (28). Taking the limit of W (W → ∞), we obtain…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dividing both sides by i∈N λ i and using Little's theorem, we obtain (27). Next, we prove (28). Taking…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However the above work consider wireless fading to be an i.i.d process. When channel state evolution has Markov properties, scheduling to minimize delay performance and maximize throughput have been studied in [27], [28], [34]. Scheduling policy based on value iteration is proposed in [28] and a Whittle-like index policy to achieve delay-power trade-off is studied in [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the above work assumed the channel fading to be an i.i.d process. A more practical assumption to model the timevarying channel is to assume that channel states evolve as a Markov chain similar to [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%