2015
DOI: 10.1145/2829988.2787510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timely

Abstract: Datacenter transports aim to deliver low latency messaging together with high throughput. We show that simple packet delay, measured as round-trip times at hosts, is an effective congestion signal without the need for switch feedback. First, we show that advances in NIC hardware have made RTT measurement possible with microsecond accuracy, and that these RTTs are sufficient to estimate switch queueing. Then we describe how TIMELY can adjust transmission rates using RTT gradients to keep packet latency low whil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advanced CC mechanisms for DCNs: Some recent pioneering works have proposed sophisticated CC mechanisms showing outstanding performance in DCNs [3,23,25,27,29,47]. For example, HPCC [25] achieves remarkably short FCTs while offering good throughput and stability to traffic changes (e.g., incast events).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Advanced CC mechanisms for DCNs: Some recent pioneering works have proposed sophisticated CC mechanisms showing outstanding performance in DCNs [3,23,25,27,29,47]. For example, HPCC [25] achieves remarkably short FCTs while offering good throughput and stability to traffic changes (e.g., incast events).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last decade has witnessed an ever-growing interest on optimizing Data Center Networks (DCN) given the critical services they run and the high CAPEX and OPEX these infrastructures entail. Among the large spectrum of traffic optimization mechanisms [24], Congestion Control (CC) has been especially explored in the literature [3,23,25,27,29,44,47]. Nowadays, most production DCNs run two main CC protocols: (𝑖) DCTCP [3], for datacenters based on the traditional TCP/IP stack, and (𝑖𝑖) DCQCN [47], for emerging RDMA-based DCNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, multiple iterations of CC have been deployed in the wild, since TCP Tahoe, including TCP Cubic [18], TCP Compound [51] and MultiPath TCP [43]. At the same time, there has been a plethora of proposed CC algorithms for data centre ( [5,36,61]), wireless ([26, 35, 47]) and satellite ([3, 14, 54]) networks all of which present wildly different characteristics and challenges compared to each other.…”
Section: Congestion Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to RFC 793 [7], Tahoe [8], Reno [9], and NewReno [10], binary increase congestion control (BIC) [11] and Cubic [12] are considered loss-based TCP-CCAs. Vegas [13], FAST [14], low latency congestion control (Lola) [15], and Timely [16] are known as delay-based TCP-CCAs. Vegas-reno (Veno) [17], Compound [18], Fusion [19], Illinois [20], bottleneck bandwidth and round trip time (BBR) [21], and performance-oriented congestion control (PCC) [22] are considered hybrid TCP-CCAs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%