2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.11.569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timeslot-sharing algorithm with a dynamic grouping for WDM broadcast-and-select star networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that the complexity of IPOSS algorithm, using the ls-ee strategy, is less than the complexity of OIS algorithm which is in O(nw 2 k) time, where k is the maximum value of D h + D l matrix. For example, let us suppose that during a transmission frame three requests, namely the D l (2, 3), D l (3, 1) and D l (3,3) have the same value of 5 data packets. In that case, IOSS would randomly select one among the aforementioned requests.…”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is obvious that the complexity of IPOSS algorithm, using the ls-ee strategy, is less than the complexity of OIS algorithm which is in O(nw 2 k) time, where k is the maximum value of D h + D l matrix. For example, let us suppose that during a transmission frame three requests, namely the D l (2, 3), D l (3, 1) and D l (3,3) have the same value of 5 data packets. In that case, IOSS would randomly select one among the aforementioned requests.…”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timeslots l 1 l 2 l 3 l 4 l 5 l 6 l 7 l 8 λ 1 u 2 u 3 u 3 u 3 λ 2 u 3 u 3 u 3 u 2 u 2 u 2 u 2 u 2 Finally, the requests d l (1, 1), d l (2, 1), d l (3,2) and d l (1,2) are processed following the same logic and the final scheduling matrix are formed as follows:…”
Section: A a Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation