2013
DOI: 10.14214/sf.1009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing and duration of short-day treatment influence morphology and second bud flush in Picea abies seedlings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
23
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained by Dormling et al (1968), Dormling (1973Dormling ( , 1979Dormling ( , 1993, Ekberg et al (1979), Konttinen et al (2003Konttinen et al ( , 2007, Kohmann and Johnsen (2007), as well as Fløistad and Granhus (2013). Activity of dormancy-related genes as identified by Stattin et al (2011) indicated that the seedlings in our study need at least 14 days of SD treatment, corresponding to a photoperiod of 11 h for dormancy induction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results were obtained by Dormling et al (1968), Dormling (1973Dormling ( , 1979Dormling ( , 1993, Ekberg et al (1979), Konttinen et al (2003Konttinen et al ( , 2007, Kohmann and Johnsen (2007), as well as Fløistad and Granhus (2013). Activity of dormancy-related genes as identified by Stattin et al (2011) indicated that the seedlings in our study need at least 14 days of SD treatment, corresponding to a photoperiod of 11 h for dormancy induction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Several studies suggest that less than 2 weeks of SD treatment is enough to terminate apical shoot growth (Dormling et al 1968;Heide 1974;Konttinen et al 2003;Fløistad and Granhus 2013). Our results indicate that 7 days of SD treatment is as effective as longer SD treatments to stop apical shoot growth.…”
Section: Shoot Growthsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations