2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing and Magnitude of Regional Right Ventricular Function: A Speckle Tracking-Derived Strain Study of Normal Subjects and Patients with Right Ventricular Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
151
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
151
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, all the other approaches (M1, M3, and M4; Figure 3) to obtain free wall 3-segment RVLS average yielded similar values, irrespective of the use of a 3-segment or a 6-segment ROI or of the strain averaging method (M3: manually averaging of free wall segments by the operator from nonsimultaneous segmental values versus M4: measured as the systolic peak of the average strain curve; Figure 2). Because in healthy subjects the segmental peaks are almost simultaneous, 22 our pilot study was useful to confirm the assumption that M3 and M4 provide practically similar measurements. As both M1 and M4 were used interchangeably in previous articles, we aimed to compare them in the entire population not only in terms of reference values but also as feasibility and reproducibility and consequently to identify which one is more suitable for the routine clinical use.…”
Section: Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Conversely, all the other approaches (M1, M3, and M4; Figure 3) to obtain free wall 3-segment RVLS average yielded similar values, irrespective of the use of a 3-segment or a 6-segment ROI or of the strain averaging method (M3: manually averaging of free wall segments by the operator from nonsimultaneous segmental values versus M4: measured as the systolic peak of the average strain curve; Figure 2). Because in healthy subjects the segmental peaks are almost simultaneous, 22 our pilot study was useful to confirm the assumption that M3 and M4 provide practically similar measurements. As both M1 and M4 were used interchangeably in previous articles, we aimed to compare them in the entire population not only in terms of reference values but also as feasibility and reproducibility and consequently to identify which one is more suitable for the routine clinical use.…”
Section: Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Good correlations were obtained comparing TAPSE with RVEF, [16][17][18][19][20] and better correlations were obtained comparing TAPSE with RV fractional area of change 6,12 and global RV strain. 21 Correlations were more modest when compared with RVEF using magnetic resonance imaging. 16 Theoretically, RV annular displacement should be related to SV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The post-systolic strain index (PSI) was calculated from the following formula: PSI = (peak strain -PSS)/peak strain. (Meris et al , 2010, Teske, De Boeck, 2007 Both PSS and PSI at the basal and mid-RV free wall were averaged.…”
Section: Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%