Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy 2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4377-1616-0.00028-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing Cycles of Implantable Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the algorithm will decipher this instead as PVC if the As–Vs interval is less than 80 ms (Medtronic algorithm). Based on the PVC response algorithm, the modified atrial‐based timing of this Medtronic pacemaker is expected to switch from atrial‐based timing (LRI: As–Ap or Ap–Ap) to a ventricular‐based timing predicated on ventriculo atrial escape interval (VAEI) 2 . The calculated VAEI here is 600 ms (LRI of 850 ms—sensed AV delay of 250 ms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the algorithm will decipher this instead as PVC if the As–Vs interval is less than 80 ms (Medtronic algorithm). Based on the PVC response algorithm, the modified atrial‐based timing of this Medtronic pacemaker is expected to switch from atrial‐based timing (LRI: As–Ap or Ap–Ap) to a ventricular‐based timing predicated on ventriculo atrial escape interval (VAEI) 2 . The calculated VAEI here is 600 ms (LRI of 850 ms—sensed AV delay of 250 ms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the PVC response algorithm, the modified atrial-based timing of this Medtronic pacemaker is expected to switch from atrial-based timing (LRI: As-Ap or Ap-Ap) to a ventricular-based timing predicated on ventriculo atrial escape interval (VAEI). 2 The calculated VAEI here is 600 ms (LRI of 850 ms-sensed AV delay of 250 ms). Assuming that the PVC response is triggered within the first 80 ms following an As, this elegantly explains the premature forced atrial pacing (As-Ap of around 670 ms) faster than the LRI (850 ms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas managed ventricular pacing and DDD pacing modes rely on modified atrial-based algorithms, DDI pacing mode uses ventricular-based timing cycles. 1 Hence, the cycle length between 2 atrial paced events is dictated not on the A-A interval but on the V-A interval. This feature is illustrated in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDI is a ventricular-based pacing mode and the cycle length between 2 atrially paced events is dictated by the V-A interval. 1 With greater emphasis on minimizing right ventricular pacing, the programmed paced AV delay is often lengthened, thus resulting in a shorter V-A interval. When intrinsic conduction times through the AV node are faster than the programmed paced AV delay, the lower rate of pacing (ie, cycle length between 2 AP events) is necessarily faster than what is programmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMT was initiated following the 6 th QRS complex of Figure 1. Variability in the AV delay of the first six complexes resulted from the programmable Dynamic AV Delay feature that assigned a paced AV delay for each beat based on the interval between sensed atrial events (AA interval) that immediately preceded the current beat 1,2 . A programmable maximum‐paced AV delay was assigned to AA intervals equal to the lower rate limit (LRL) interval, and a programmable minimum value was assigned to AA intervals equal to the upper rate limit (URL) interval (Fig.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%