2002
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2002.803976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing error recovery in turbo-coded systems on AWGN channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown that the APPA curve after six iterations exhibits a negligible performance degradation with respect to that with ideal synchronisation. Although the BER performance of the conventional NDA method has not been included in this figure, it has been shown in Mielczarek's work [6] that the ML symbol timing recovery algorithm reaches a performance floor in a turbo-coded system and the performance is much worse than their proposed method, which is about 0.1-0.2 dB away from the ideal performance curve.…”
Section: Ber Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is shown that the APPA curve after six iterations exhibits a negligible performance degradation with respect to that with ideal synchronisation. Although the BER performance of the conventional NDA method has not been included in this figure, it has been shown in Mielczarek's work [6] that the ML symbol timing recovery algorithm reaches a performance floor in a turbo-coded system and the performance is much worse than their proposed method, which is about 0.1-0.2 dB away from the ideal performance curve.…”
Section: Ber Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mielczarek et al carried out a programme of research on this issue. Their most recent work [6] proposes a sort of soft bit combination timing recovery approach taking account of the influence of timing offset on turbo decoding. In this approach, a coarse ML NDA detector selects two sets of samples which lie closest to the optimum sampling point from four samples per symbol, and sends to the decoding process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [12] have derived semi-analytical expressions of the estimator mean and variance, as function of the timing offset, for a CA decision-directed (DD) timing synchronizer based on MMD. However, the performance evaluation has been made only at low SNR regime, based on the assumption that inter-symbol interference (ISI) could be approximated by an additive Gaussian noise as in [9]. To evaluate one estimator relevance, its MSE is traditionaly compared to lower bounds such as the Cramer-Rao Bounds (CRB) [19] as the one derived for the unknown random phase offset problem in [16], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from on-time sample detection, in the absence of synchronization, an optimal Manuscript approach for signals sampled at the symbol rate is taken in [10], [11]; additionally, [12] presents a further analysis that handles arbitrary baseband pulse shapes. Another approach can be found in [13]: based on a coarse timing estimation, the sequence estimation is performed by combining soft bits that are obtained by the turbo decoder. A ML estimator for time delay estimation from DS-CDMA multipath transmissions is proposed in [14], in which the EM algorithm is applied to decouple the computation task into a parallel processor implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%